Grade by Grade
A. Global Settlement: Patterns and Sustainability · Global Settlement: Patterns and Sustainability

Investigating a Settlement Issue: The Geographic Inquiry Process

A2.1 A2.2 A2.3 A2.4 A2.5 A2.6About 60 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can formulate questions to investigate an issue about human settlement and sustainability from a geographic perspective.
  • I can gather and organize data from different sources and judge how reliable they are.
  • I can use maps, including the spatial boundaries of an issue, and other tools to analyse data.
  • I can evaluate evidence, draw a conclusion and communicate it to a specific audience.

Words to know

geographic inquiry process
The steps geographers use to investigate an issue: ask questions, gather and organize, interpret and analyse, evaluate and conclude, and communicate.
geographic perspective
Looking at an issue's environmental, economic, political and social impacts.
spatial boundaries
The edges of where an issue happens and whom it affects, which may reach far beyond the site itself.
greenfield site
Land that has not been built on before, such as farmland or forest.
brownfield site
Land that was used before, often for industry, and may need cleaning up before it is reused.
primary source
Information collected first-hand, such as your own survey, photo or interview.
secondary source
Information someone else collected or wrote, such as a report, article or census table.
bias
A one-sided point of view that may leave out or play down other views or evidence.

Remember from Grade 7

In Grade 7 you used the geographic inquiry process to investigate a natural resource issue, and you looked at issues from a geographic perspective: their environmental, economic, political and social impacts. In Grade 8 you'll use the same process for an issue about human settlement and sustainability, and you'll pay special attention to the spatial boundaries of the issue: where it starts and stops, and who is affected.

A downtown street with a protected green bike lane, a cyclist, a bus and people walking on a tree-lined sidewalk.
How should a city share its streets among cyclists, buses, cars and walkers? Transportation is one settlement issue you could investigate. AI-generated image
1. Askquestions2. Gather &organize3. Analysedata, maps4. Evaluate& conclude5. ShareresultsThe geographic inquiry processThink about environmental, economic,political and social impacts at every step.
The five steps of the geographic inquiry process: ask questions, gather and organize, analyse data and maps, evaluate and conclude, and share results. A geographic perspective (environmental, economic, political and social impacts) is used at every step.

Our model inquiry (pretend data)

Maple Bend is a pretend town of about 20 000 people that is growing. It needs about 600 new homes. The council is choosing between two options:

  • Option 1: a greenfield site. Build 600 detached houses on 80 hectares of farmland at the north edge of town.
  • Option 2: a brownfield site. Build 600 homes as apartments and townhouses on a 12-hectare old factory site near downtown. The soil is contaminated and must be cleaned first.
Worked example

Step 1: Formulate questions

Write an inquiry question and supporting questions for the Maple Bend issue.

  1. A good inquiry question is open (not yes/no), focused and researchable: "Which option for Maple Bend's 600 new homes is more sustainable for the community and the environment?"
  2. Add supporting questions using the concepts of geographic thinking:
  3. Spatial significance: What is special about each site's location (near transit, on farmland, near a creek)?
  4. Patterns and trends: How fast is Maple Bend growing, and how much farmland has it already lost?
  5. Interrelationships: How would each option affect runoff, traffic and the creek downstream?
  6. Geographic perspective: What are the environmental, economic, political and social impacts? Who are the stakeholders, including the First Nation whose traditional territory includes the town?

Inquiry question: Which option for Maple Bend's 600 new homes is more sustainable? plus supporting questions for each concept.

Step 2: Gather and organize

Use many sources so you see more than one perspective:

  • Secondary sources: the town's official plan and staff reports, Statistics Canada census data, conservation authority floodplain maps, satellite images from different years, news articles, and websites of groups that support or oppose each option.
  • Primary sources: your own survey of residents, photos of the sites, an interview with a farmer or a town planner.

Check each source: Who made it, and why? When was it made? What evidence does it give? Is it biased (for example, a developer's brochure or an advocacy group's flyer)? Bias doesn't make a source useless, but you need to balance it with others.

Organize what you find, for example in a table with one column per perspective or one row per option.

Pretend dataOption 1: greenfieldOption 2: brownfield
Land used80 ha of farmland12 ha of old factory land
Homes per hectare600 ÷ 80 = 7.5600 ÷ 12 = 50
Farmland lost80 ha0 ha
New roads and pipes neededabout 4 kmabout 0.5 km
Distance to downtownabout 5 kmabout 0.5 km
On a bus route?NoYes
Soil cleanup needed?NoYes, at a high cost
Type of homesDetached houses with yardsApartments and townhouses
Maple Bend's two options. All data are pretend.

Step 3: Interpret and analyse, using maps and tools

  • Maps and GIS layers: put the two sites on a map with layers for farmland, the creek and floodplain, bus routes, and schools and stores. Option 1 is far from the bus route and drains toward the creek; Option 2 is within walking distance of downtown.
  • Spatial boundaries: the issue reaches beyond each site. Runoff from Option 1 flows downstream to other communities. New car trips from Option 1 add traffic on roads through the whole town. Loss of farmland affects the region's food supply.
  • Calculations and graphs: Option 2 fits 50 homes per hectare, more than six times as many as Option 1 (7.5). A bar graph makes the difference in farmland lost easy to see.
  • Graphic organizers: a stakeholder chart or a pros-and-cons table by perspective.
Farmland lost (hectares)80 haOption 1greenfield0 haOption 2brownfieldHomes per hectare7.5Option 1greenfield50Option 2brownfieldpretend Maple Bend data
Two quick bar graphs from the Maple Bend table: Option 2 uses no farmland and fits more than six times as many homes on each hectare. Pretend data.
Worked example

Step 4: Evaluate evidence and draw conclusions

Weigh the evidence from the table and analysis, and write a conclusion.

  1. Environmental: Option 2 loses no farmland, adds little new pavement and cleans up contaminated land. Option 1 paves 80 ha and increases runoff to the creek. Strong evidence favours Option 2.
  2. Economic: Option 2 has a high cleanup cost, but Option 1 needs about 4 km of new roads and pipes that the town must maintain forever. Evidence is mixed but leans toward Option 2 in the long run.
  3. Social: Option 2 is near transit, stores and services, which helps people without cars. Some families want detached houses with yards (Option 1). Both meet some needs.
  4. Political: Most Ontario plans encourage intensification, and the First Nation must be consulted on either option.
  5. Limitations: the data are estimates; we don't know the exact cleanup cost, and survey results might change the picture.

Conclusion: Option 2 (brownfield) is more sustainable overall because it protects farmland, uses existing roads and pipes, and is close to transit. To address its weaknesses, the town should seek cleanup funding, include family-sized townhouses and affordable units, and consult the First Nation early.

Step 5: Communicate

Choose a format that fits your audience and use geography vocabulary (settlement pattern, population density, land use, sustainable development, land reclamation, urbanization).

  • Town council: a short report or slideshow with maps, data and a clear recommendation.
  • Residents: a one-page infographic or a short video.
  • Younger students: a picture book or a labelled model.
  • The general public: a letter to the editor, a photo essay, a podcast or a website.

Always cite your sources, label pretend or estimated data, and include at least one map.

Hands-on activity

Investigate a real settlement issue near you

You need: a computer or tablet (with a grown-up's permission), paper and a pencil.

  1. Find a real issue about settlement and sustainability in your area. Ideas: a development application on your municipality's website, a plan for a new bike lane or transit line, a proposal to build on farmland or a wetland, a local flooding problem, or a community garden.
  2. Write an inquiry question and three supporting questions (one about spatial significance, one about interrelationships, one about geographic perspective).
  3. Gather three sources, including at least one map. For each, note who made it, when, and whether it might be biased.
  4. Sketch a map showing the site and its spatial boundaries: who and what else is affected (downstream, nearby neighbourhoods, roads).
  5. Write a conclusion of 3 to 5 sentences and choose an audience and format to share it.

What to look for: an open, focused question; sources from more than one perspective; a map with a legend; and a conclusion supported by evidence. Grown-ups: help choose safe, reliable websites.

Just for fun

Ask a geographer any question and the answer usually starts with "It depends..." Then they ask five supporting questions, gather three sources and make a map. Honestly? That's the inquiry process working perfectly.

Your turn

1

List the five steps of the geographic inquiry process in order.

2

Which is a better inquiry question, and why? (a) "Is Maple Bend growing?" (b) "How could Maple Bend grow in a way that protects farmland and the creek?"

3

Name the four parts of a geographic perspective.

4

What are the spatial boundaries of an issue? Give an example from Maple Bend.

5

Is a resident survey you made yourself a primary or secondary source?

6

Using the pretend data, how many homes per hectare does each option have?

7

Give two questions you should ask to judge whether a source is reliable.

More practice: warm-up

1

What is a greenfield site?

2

What is a brownfield site?

3

Is a Statistics Canada census table a primary or secondary source for you?

4

What does bias mean?

5

Name one format for communicating results to a town council.

More practice: on your own

1

A developer's brochure says Option 1 is "the greenest choice". How should you use this source?

2

Which GIS layers would help analyse the Maple Bend options? Name three.

3

Option 1 needs 4 km of new roads and pipes; Option 2 needs 0.5 km. How many times more does Option 1 need, and why does this matter economically?

4

Write a supporting question about patterns and trends for an inquiry on urban sprawl in your region.

5

Why should a conclusion mention limitations?

Challenge

1

A classmate concludes, "Option 1 is better because families like yards." Evaluate this conclusion using the geographic perspective.

2

Explain how the spatial boundaries of the Maple Bend issue could reach a First Nation community 20 km downstream on the same river.

3

Plan how you'd communicate the Maple Bend conclusion to two different audiences, explaining your choices.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What is the first step of the geographic inquiry process?

2.

Which is the best inquiry question?

3.

Which is a primary source?

4.

What are the spatial boundaries of an issue?

5.

Using the pretend data, how many homes per hectare would Option 2 have (600 homes on 12 ha)?

6.

Which four parts make up a geographic perspective?

7.

Why should you check sources for bias?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: Overall expectation A2 asks students to use the geographic inquiry process to investigate issues related to the interrelationship between human settlement and sustainability from a geographic perspective. This lesson walks through all six specific expectations: formulating questions (A2.1), gathering and organizing (A2.2), analysing and constructing maps with a focus on spatial boundaries (A2.3), interpreting data with tools (A2.4), evaluating evidence and drawing conclusions (A2.5), and communicating for an audience (A2.6). Maple Bend and its data are pretend.

Common difficulties:

  • Yes/no questions. Help your child rewrite them starting with "How..." or "To what extent...".
  • Using only one source or one perspective. Ask, "Who might disagree, and what's their evidence?"
  • Conclusions without evidence. Every claim should point to data, a map or a source.

How to help: The real-issue activity can take a few sessions. Help your child find your municipality's planning or development page, and talk about the issue at dinner. This inquiry is also good preparation for Grade 9 geography, where inquiry and spatial skills continue.