Grade by Grade
C. Canada, 1929–1945 · Canada, 1929–1945: Depression, Extremism and the Second World War

Hard Times: Life During the Great Depression

C1.1 C1.3 A1.2 A1.3About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe how the Great Depression changed daily life for different groups in Canada.
  • I can explain the causes and effects of the Dust Bowl on the Prairies.
  • I can describe how relief worked and why many people found it hard to accept.
  • I can analyse a primary source about the Depression and judge its usefulness.

Words to know

relief
Government help for people with no income, usually food and rent vouchers rather than cash. Also called "the dole" or, in Canadian slang, "pogey".
Dust Bowl
The drought-stricken southern Prairies in the 1930s, where dry winds blew away topsoil in huge dust storms.
Palliser's Triangle
A dry region of the southern Prairies (mostly in southern Saskatchewan and Alberta) that suffered most in the 1930s droughts.
Bennett buggy
A car pulled by horses because its owner could not afford gasoline, mockingly named after Prime Minister R. B. Bennett.
riding the rails
Travelling illegally on freight trains to look for work, as thousands of young men did in the 1930s.
relief camp
A camp run by the Department of National Defence (1932 to 1936) where single unemployed men worked on projects for 20 cents a day plus room and board.
deportation
Forcing a person who is not a citizen to leave the country.
primary source
Evidence created at the time being studied, such as a letter, photograph, diary, newspaper or government record.

Hook: what would you give up first?

Imagine your family's income fell by 90%, as Saskatchewan's did in two years. What would you stop buying first? What could you grow, fix or share? Millions of Canadians faced exactly these choices in the 1930s. In this lesson you will see that the Depression was not the same for everyone: where you lived, your gender, your background and your job shaped how hard it hit.

Losing work, losing homes

By 1933 about 30% of workers had no job, and many others worked fewer hours for lower pay. The Canadian Encyclopedia estimates that one in five Canadians depended on government relief at some point.

  • Families lost homes and farms when they could not make mortgage payments. Some moved in with relatives; others took in boarders.
  • Young people left school to find any work they could. Many delayed marriage and starting families.
  • Single young men were often refused relief in cities, which preferred to help families. Thousands rode the rails across the country looking for work, a dangerous and illegal way to travel.
  • Women were told that married women should give jobs to men. Many still worked as domestic servants or in low-paid factory jobs, and nearly all were stretching tiny budgets at home.

The Dust Bowl: drought on the Prairies

The southern Prairies suffered a double blow. Wheat prices collapsed, and then years of drought turned fields to dust, especially in Palliser's Triangle in southern Saskatchewan and Alberta.

  • Causes: low rainfall and heat; and also farming methods. Years of ploughing and leaving fields bare (summer fallow) had broken up the grass roots that held the soil, so the wind could lift it.
  • Effects: dust storms that darkened the sky, failed crops, plagues of grasshoppers, and cattle with nothing to eat. In Saskatchewan, The Canadian Encyclopedia reports, 66% of the rural population ended up on relief.
  • Many families abandoned their farms and moved north to the wooded Parkland or to cities. Some people from other provinces sent relief trains of food and clothing west.

The Prairie provinces were close to bankrupt by 1932, so the federal government had to lend them money to pay for relief.

Who was hit hardest by the Depression?The Great Depression1929 to 1939Prairie farmerslow wheat prices +drought; 66% of ruralSaskatchewan on reliefSingle unemployed menoften refused city relief;rode the rails; sent torelief campsImmigrantsalmost 30,000 deported inthe decade, many forneeding reliefWomenmarried women pushed outof paid jobs; ranhouseholds with almostnothingFirst Nations, Inuit inthe Northfur prices fell; familiesrelied on trade goods theycould no longer affordAtlantic and resourcetownsfish, coal and lumbermarkets shrank; low reliefrates
The Depression was not the same for everyone. Use this diagram to compare how different groups were affected, and why.

How relief worked

In the 1930s there was no unemployment insurance and no national welfare system. Helping the poor was mainly the job of municipalities, with some money from the provinces and the federal government.

  • Relief was usually vouchers for food, fuel and rent, not cash.
  • To qualify, people often had to prove they had sold their possessions, and many towns required men to do work (like breaking rocks or clearing snow) for relief.
  • Some towns required people to have lived there for a long time (residency rules), which excluded people who had moved for work.
  • Rates varied hugely. A family of five might get $60 a month in Calgary but only $19 in Halifax.
  • Many people felt deep shame at being "on the dole" or "on pogey", because they had been taught to be self-reliant.

Relief was even harsher for some groups. Immigrants who were not yet citizens could be deported for needing relief: almost 30,000 were deported during the decade. First Nations families on reserves had to apply through the federal Indian agent, and help was often very limited.

Monthly relief for a family of five, mid-1930s0204060$60Calgary$19Halifaxdollars per monthSource: The Canadian Encyclopedia, “Great Depression”.
Where you lived mattered. Relief rates were set locally, so a family in Halifax received about one-third of what a family in Calgary received.
How families got by: from self-help to reliefSelf-helpgrow food, mendclothes, sharehomes, take inboardersCommunitychurches, unions,co-operatives,neighboursMunicipal reliefvouchers for foodand rent, oftenwith work requiredFederal andprovincial aidrelief funds,relief camps (1932to 1936)Governments expected people to exhaust their own resources before asking for relief.
Families usually turned to relief only after trying the other steps. Relief was a last resort, which is one reason many people went hungry before they asked for it.

In the North

For many Inuit and northern First Nations communities, the 1930s brought their own hardship. Over the previous decades, the fur trade had made many families depend on trade goods such as rifles, ammunition, flour, tea and cloth, bought with furs at trading posts. When fur prices fell sharply in the Depression, families could buy far less, while the game they relied on was sometimes scarce. Communities relied on their own knowledge of the land, sharing and kinship networks to survive, as they always had.

Working with primary sources (A1.2, A1.3)

When you analyse a primary source from the 1930s, ask:

  • Who made it, when, and why (purpose)?
  • What does it show or say? What does it leave out?
  • Perspective: whose point of view is it? A government report on relief and a letter from a family on relief will see the same thing differently.
  • Credibility and usefulness: How reliable is it for my question? A source can be biased and still very useful, because it shows how someone thought at the time.
Worked example

Let's analyse a photograph as evidence

A 1930s photograph shows a car with no engine being pulled by two horses on a Saskatchewan road. A caption written at the time calls it a "Bennett buggy." How useful is this photograph for the question: How did the Depression affect Prairie farm families?

  1. Describe: a car being pulled by horses on a rural road. The family owned a car, so they had been doing well in the 1920s.
  2. Infer: they could no longer afford gasoline or repairs, so they reused the car as a horse-drawn wagon. This shows falling income and making do.
  3. Context: the name "Bennett buggy" mocked Prime Minister R. B. Bennett, showing that many people blamed the government.
  4. Limits: one photo shows one family. It does not tell us how common this was, how the family felt, or what happened to them. A photographer may also have chosen a dramatic scene.
  5. Judge: useful as evidence of both hardship and anger at the government, but we should corroborate it with other sources (relief statistics, letters, newspaper reports).

The photograph is useful but limited: it is strong evidence of making do and of political anger, but we need other sources to know how widespread the hardship was.

Hands-on activity

A Depression budget

You need: a current grocery flyer (paper or online), paper, a pencil and a calculator.

  1. In Halifax in the mid-1930s, a family of five got about $19 a month in relief. Prices were much lower then, but so were incomes; that $19 was meant to cover food and fuel for a month and it was not enough.
  2. Today, plan one week of dinners for five people using the cheapest items in the flyer. Add up the cost.
  3. Now cut your total by one-third and replan. What did you remove? What could you grow, make from scratch, or get from neighbours?
  4. Write a paragraph: How might living like this for years affect a family's health, schooling and feelings about government?

What to look for: realistic cuts (meat replaced with beans or oats, no treats), and a reflection that links money to health, education and political anger.

Your turn

1

What was relief, and who mainly ran it in the 1930s?

2

Give two causes of the Dust Bowl.

3

What was a Bennett buggy, and what does the name tell us?

4

Why did many single young men ride the rails?

5

Why might an immigrant family be afraid to ask for relief?

6

Give one way the Depression affected northern Indigenous communities.

7

Why did relief for a family of five differ between Calgary and Halifax?

More practice: warm-up

1

What does "pogey" mean in Canadian slang?

2

Which region of the Prairies was driest in the 1930s?

3

What did a relief camp pay per day?

4

About what share of Canadians depended on relief at some point?

5

Is a photograph taken in 1934 a primary or secondary source about the 1930s?

More practice: on your own

1

Explain why relief was often called humiliating.

2

Compare how the Depression affected a Saskatchewan farm family and a Toronto factory worker.

3

Why was the Dust Bowl both a natural and a human-made disaster?

4

How could a single source, like a letter to the prime minister asking for help, be biased but still useful?

5

Why did many families delay marriage or having children during the 1930s?

Challenge

1

"The Great Depression was a national disaster, but it was not experienced equally." Support this statement with evidence about at least three groups.

2

Using cause and consequence, explain how a fall in world wheat prices could lead to a family in Regina losing their home even though they did not farm.

3

A historian wants to know how common Bennett buggies were. Which other sources should they look for, and why?

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What was relief in the 1930s?

2.

Which region was hit hardest by drought in the 1930s?

3.

What was a Bennett buggy?

4.

Why could some immigrants be deported in the 1930s?

5.

Which is the best reason a historian should corroborate a single photograph?

6.

Who mainly ran relief in the 1930s?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: This lesson covers social changes of the Depression (C1.1), including the Dust Bowl and how different groups were affected, plus the economic effects of relief (C1.3). It practises gathering and judging primary sources (A1.2, A1.3).

No "Just for fun" box in this lesson: it focuses on real poverty and hardship.

Common difficulties:

  • Treating the Depression as one experience. Keep asking "for whom?"
  • Confusing relief (local, 1930s) with employment insurance (national, from 1940).

How to help: The budget activity can spark good conversations about what your family would cut. Many families have Depression stories handed down; if yours does, record one together and treat it as an oral-history source: who told it, when, and how it might have changed over time.