Grade by Grade
C. Canada, 1929–1945 · Canada, 1929–1945: Depression, Extremism and the Second World War

First Nations, Métis and Inuit, 1929–1945: Government Policies and Indigenous Responses

C1.4 C1.1 C3.1 A1.2 A1.5About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe key government policies affecting First Nations, Métis and Inuit between 1929 and 1945.
  • I can explain the causes of these policies and assess their impact on Indigenous individuals and communities.
  • I can describe how First Nations, Métis and Inuit organized and resisted.
  • I can explain the significance of the Ewing Commission and the Métis Population Betterment Act.

Words to know

Indian Act
The federal law (first passed in 1876) that controls many aspects of the lives of First Nations people with status, their bands and reserves.
status
Legal registration as an "Indian" under the Indian Act, which brought certain rights and many restrictions.
enfranchisement
Under the Indian Act, losing Indian status, often in exchange for the right to vote or other rights; sometimes imposed without consent.
assimilation
A policy aimed at making a group give up its own culture, language and identity and adopt those of the dominant society.
residential schools
Government-funded, church-run schools that First Nations, Métis and Inuit children were forced to attend, away from their families, to assimilate them. They caused deep, lasting harm.
Métis settlement
Land set aside for Métis communities in Alberta, beginning with the 1938 Métis Population Betterment Act.
sterilization
A medical procedure that permanently prevents a person from having children. Some provinces passed laws allowing it without full consent.
self-determination
The right of a people to make decisions about their own government, land and future.

Approaching this lesson

This lesson deals with government policies that caused serious harm to First Nations, Métis and Inuit, including residential schools. It describes them factually, without graphic detail. Some readers may have family connections to these experiences. Support is available 24 hours a day through the Indian Residential Schools Crisis Line (1-866-925-4419) and the Hope for Wellness Help Line (1-855-242-3310).

Remember also that this is a history of resilience and organizing: First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities resisted, built political organizations and kept their cultures alive, and they continue to do so today.

In Grade 8 you studied the Indian Act of 1876 and the beginnings of residential schools. This lesson looks at how those policies continued, and changed, from 1929 to 1945.

The Indian Act in the 1930s

The main goal of federal policy was still assimilation. Under the Indian Act, the Department of Indian Affairs and its local Indian agents controlled much of daily life on reserves.

  • Land claims: a 1927 amendment made it illegal for First Nations to raise money or hire lawyers to pursue land claims without government permission. It stayed in force until 1951.
  • Ceremonies: bans on important ceremonies, such as the potlatch on the West Coast and some dances on the Prairies, were still in the law, though many communities continued them, sometimes in secret.
  • Enfranchisement: a 1933 amendment again allowed the government to remove status from some First Nations people without their consent.
  • Relief: in the Depression, First Nations families had to ask the Indian agent for help, and relief was usually very small.

Causes: these policies came from the belief, widely held in government and society, that Indigenous cultures should disappear and that Indigenous people should be controlled, and from the government's interest in land and resources.

Residential schools

The residential school system was close to its largest in this period: according to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, there were about 80 schools in 1931. Children were taken from their families, punished for speaking their languages, and often lived in poor conditions with poor food and health care. Many suffered abuse, and many children died. In the 1940s, federal researchers even ran nutrition experiments on children in some schools without their or their families' consent.

The schools caused harm that has passed from generation to generation. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (2015) documented this history and called it cultural genocide. Survivors' courage in speaking about their experiences made this history known.

The vote, and identity controlled by government

  • The Dominion Franchise Act (1934) explicitly excluded Inuit from voting in federal elections. Most First Nations people with status could not vote federally unless they gave up their status. Inuit gained the federal vote in 1950, and First Nations without having to give up status in 1960.
  • Inuit and federal responsibility: in 1939, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Inuit are a federal responsibility under the constitution, like First Nations. Ottawa, however, provided few services in the North.
  • Disc numbers: from 1941, the federal government gave Inuit identification discs with numbers, which officials used instead of names, because government workers did not use Inuit naming traditions. The system was replaced through Project Surname (1968 to 1971). Many Inuit experienced the numbers as dehumanizing.
  • Sterilization laws: Alberta (1928) and British Columbia (1933) passed laws allowing the sterilization of people labelled "mentally defective", based on the false science of eugenics. Indigenous people, especially women, were among those disproportionately affected, along with people with disabilities, poor people and immigrants. Alberta's law lasted until 1972.

The Métis in Alberta: the Ewing Commission and Métis settlements

Many Métis families in Alberta had no secure land. They often lived on road allowances (strips of Crown land beside roads), with very little income during the Depression.

  • In 1932, Métis leaders including Joseph Dion, Malcolm Norris and Jim Brady helped form the Métis Association of Alberta to press for land.
  • In 1934, the Alberta government set up the Ewing Commission to study the conditions of the Métis. It recommended that land be set aside.
  • The Métis Population Betterment Act (1938) created 12 settlement areas ("colonies") in central and northern Alberta. Four later lost their status, but eight Métis Settlements remain today, the only legislated Métis land base in Canada.

Significance: the Act showed that Métis organizing could win results, though the settlements were controlled by the province for decades and did not meet all Métis needs.

Government policies and Indigenous organizing, 1927 to 19441927Indian Act: ban onraising funds for landclaims1931Native Brotherhood of BCfounded1932–34Métis Association ofAlberta; EwingCommission1934Dominion Franchise Actexcludes Inuit fromvoting1938Métis PopulationBetterment Act1939–41Indian Association ofAlberta; Inuit discnumbers1944North American IndianBrotherhood
Policies imposed from outside appear alongside the political organizations that First Nations and Métis built in the same years. (Events evenly spaced, not to scale.)

Indigenous organizing and resistance

  • The Native Brotherhood of British Columbia (1931) worked for land rights, fishing rights and better conditions.
  • The Indian Association of Alberta (1939) pressed for treaty rights.
  • The North American Indian Brotherhood (1944), led by Andrew Paull of the Squamish Nation, tried to unite First Nations nationally.
  • Francis Pegahmagabow, an Anishinaabe veteran of the First World War from Wasauksing First Nation and one of Canada's most decorated soldiers, became a political activist for First Nations rights and self-government in the 1940s.

These organizations laid the groundwork for later national organizations and for the push to change the Indian Act after the war.

Policy and response, 1929 to 1945Government policies• Indian Act controls on daily life,ceremonies and land claims• Residential schools at their peak number(about 80 in 1931)• No federal vote for Inuit or most FirstNations• Sterilization laws in Alberta and BC• Disc numbers for Inuit (from 1941)Indigenous responses• Political organizations formed and grew• Métis pressed Alberta for land:settlement areas (1938)• Families kept languages, ceremonies andknowledge alive, often in secret• Petitions, delegations and legalchallenges• Military service and home-frontcontributions (next lesson)
Government policies (left) aimed at control and assimilation; Indigenous responses (right) aimed at land, rights and self-determination.

Historical perspective without excusing harm (A1.5)

Historical perspective asks why policy makers believed what they did: ideas about "civilizing", racial hierarchy and eugenics were common in government at the time. Understanding this does not excuse the harm. Historians also make sure to include Indigenous perspectives from the time, through petitions, letters, oral histories and the records of Indigenous organizations, because Indigenous people were never silent.

Worked example

Let's assess the impact of the 1927 land-claims ban

Assess the impact of the 1927 Indian Act amendment that banned raising money for land claims without permission.

  1. What it did: made it illegal for First Nations to fund legal action or hire lawyers for land claims without government permission.
  2. Cause: a response to growing First Nations land claims, especially in British Columbia, where most land had never been covered by treaties; the government wanted to stop these challenges.
  3. Short-term impact: made it extremely difficult to pursue claims in court for 24 years (1927 to 1951).
  4. Long-term impact: delayed land claims for a generation; claims resumed after 1951 and led to major court decisions later (Unit D).
  5. Indigenous response: organizations such as the Native Brotherhood of BC kept working for land and fishing rights by other means, such as petitions and delegations.

The ban had a major negative impact: it blocked legal action on land rights for 24 years. Yet First Nations kept organizing, and their claims returned with force after it was repealed in 1951.

Hands-on activity

Primary-source investigation: a petition

You need: a computer or library access and a notebook. An adult can help search.

  1. Library and Archives Canada and many Indigenous organizations' websites share historical documents. With an adult, find one primary source created by a First Nations, Métis or Inuit person or organization between 1929 and 1945 (for example, a petition, letter, photograph of a delegation or a newspaper report of a meeting).
  2. Record: who created it, when, for what audience, and what it asked for or showed.
  3. Connect it to a policy in this lesson.
  4. Write two sentences on what the source shows about Indigenous agency (people acting for themselves).

What to look for: a correctly identified source, a link to a specific policy (for example the land-claims ban or the Franchise Act), and recognition that Indigenous people were actively resisting, not passive.

Your turn

1

What was the main goal of federal Indian policy in the 1930s?

2

What did the 1927 Indian Act amendment ban?

3

About how many residential schools were there in 1931, according to the TRC?

4

What did the Dominion Franchise Act (1934) do to Inuit?

5

What were Inuit disc numbers?

6

What did the Métis Population Betterment Act (1938) do?

7

Name two Indigenous political organizations founded in this period.

More practice: warm-up

1

What is enfranchisement under the Indian Act?

2

Who were the Indian agents?

3

Which commission studied the conditions of the Métis in Alberta?

4

When did Inuit gain the federal vote?

5

Who led the North American Indian Brotherhood?

More practice: on your own

1

Explain how eugenics influenced provincial sterilization laws.

2

Why did Métis families in Alberta need land in the 1930s?

3

How did the 1939 Supreme Court decision about Inuit matter?

4

Why is it important to include Indigenous sources when studying these policies?

5

Give one continuity and one change in Indigenous policy between 1914 and 1945.

Challenge

1

Assess the significance of the Métis Population Betterment Act for Métis people.

2

Compare how government policies affected First Nations, Métis and Inuit differently in this period.

3

Using cause and consequence, explain how policies of this period connect to calls for reconciliation today.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

What did the 1927 Indian Act amendment prohibit?

2.

What did the Dominion Franchise Act of 1934 do?

3.

Which act created Métis settlement areas in Alberta?

4.

What were Inuit disc numbers?

5.

Which organization was founded in 1931 to work for land and fishing rights?

6.

What was the main goal of federal Indian policy in this period?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: This lesson covers the causes and impact of key policies affecting First Nations, Métis and Inuit (C1.4), social changes in the North (C1.1) and contributions of leaders such as Joseph Dion, Andrew Paull and Francis Pegahmagabow (C3.1). It practises using diverse primary sources (A1.2) and historical perspective (A1.5).

Sensitive content: residential schools, sterilization and identity policies are described without graphic detail. There is no "Just for fun" box. Support lines are listed at the top of the lesson: the Indian Residential Schools Crisis Line (1-866-925-4419) and the Hope for Wellness Help Line (1-855-242-3310), both available 24 hours a day.

Common difficulties:

  • Treating Indigenous peoples as one group. Keep First Nations, Métis and Inuit distinct.
  • Seeing Indigenous people only as victims. Emphasize organizing, resistance and continuity of culture.
  • Using the past tense for communities. First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities and the Métis Settlements are living communities today.

How to help: Learn whose traditional territory you live on (the Native Land Digital map is a starting point) and look for local Indigenous organizations' public events or resources.