B. Organic Chemistry · Organic ChemistryOrganic Compounds in Society: Benefits, Risks and Taking Action
B1.1 B1.2 A1.3 A1.7 A1.9 A2.1 A2.2About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can assess the benefits and risks of everyday organic compounds, including polymers, food additives, medicines and pesticides, for health, society and the environment.
- I can use the ideas of hazard, exposure, persistence and bioaccumulation to evaluate a risk.
- I can evaluate sources of information for reliability and bias.
- I can create a personal action plan to reduce my use of harmful organic compounds.
- I can describe careers that use organic chemistry and contributions of Canadian scientists.
Words to know
hazard
The potential of a substance to cause harm.
exposure
How much of a substance reaches a person or organism, and for how long.
risk
The chance that harm will actually happen; it depends on both hazard and exposure.
persistence
How long a substance lasts in the environment before breaking down.
bioaccumulation
The build-up of a substance in an organism's body over time, because it is taken in faster than it is removed.
biomagnification
The increase in concentration of a substance at each higher level of a food chain.
microplastics
Plastic pieces smaller than 5 mm, from broken-down plastic items, fibres or manufactured beads.
green chemistry
Designing chemical products and processes that reduce or eliminate hazardous substances and waste.
Weighing benefits and risks
Organic compounds have transformed life in Canada. Plastics keep food fresh and medical equipment sterile; medicines relieve pain and cure infections; fertilizers and pesticides help farmers grow more food on less land; synthetic fibres keep people warm in a northern winter. Some of the same compounds also cause harm: plastic litter in the Great Lakes, pesticides that affect pollinators, chemicals released near industrial sites.
Scientists, governments and citizens weigh these benefits and risks using a few key ideas:
- Hazard: can the substance cause harm? (Is it toxic, flammable, carcinogenic?)
- Exposure: how much reaches people or wildlife, for how long, and by what route (breathing, eating, skin)?
- Risk = hazard combined with exposure. A very hazardous chemical sealed in a lab has low risk; a mildly hazardous one that everyone breathes every day may have a significant risk.
- Persistence and bioaccumulation: compounds that last a long time and build up in living things can cause harm far from where they were used, long after.
The idea that the amount matters is old: the 16th-century physician Paracelsus is credited with the saying that the dose makes the poison.
Case 1: Plastics and microplastics
Benefits: light, strong, cheap, waterproof, shapeable, and often lower in transport energy than glass or metal. In hospitals, single-use plastics (syringes, IV bags) prevent infection.
Risks: most common plastics are addition polymers with C–C backbones that do not hydrolyse, so they persist for a very long time. Litter breaks into microplastics, which have been found in the Great Lakes, in Arctic sea ice, in drinking water and in food. Researchers are still studying their effects on health. Burning plastics, especially PVC, can release harmful gases.
Canadian actions:
- Canada banned microbeads in toiletries such as face scrubs and toothpaste in 2018.
- The federal Single-use Plastics Prohibition Regulations ban the manufacture and sale of checkout bags, cutlery, certain foodservice ware, ring carriers, stir sticks and straws (with exceptions, for example for people who need flexible straws). These were challenged in court; in January 2026 the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the government's listing of plastic manufactured items as toxic, which the ban is based on.
- Ontario municipalities run Blue Box recycling, but which plastics are accepted varies, so the resin code alone doesn't tell you if an item is recyclable.
The life cycle of a plastic product. Most plastics come from fossil fuels, and at the end of their use they are recycled, landfilled or lost as litter. Litter slowly breaks into microplastics; recycling (dashed arrow) returns the material to new products.Case 2: Pesticides
Benefits: pesticides protect crops from insects, weeds and fungi, increase yields and help prevent diseases spread by insects.
Risks: some are toxic to non-target organisms. DDT, a chlorinated organic compound, is persistent and fat-soluble, so it bioaccumulates and biomagnifies up food chains. It thinned the eggshells of birds of prey such as bald eagles and peregrine falcons. After it was phased out in Canada and the U.S. in the 1970s, these birds recovered. Neonicotinoid insecticides have raised concerns about bees and other pollinators.
Ontario actions: the Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act (in force since 2009) bans most pesticides for purely cosmetic uses on lawns and gardens. Since 2015, Ontario has regulated the use of neonicotinoid-treated corn and soybean seed.
Biomagnification of a persistent, fat-soluble chemical such as DDT. Each predator eats many prey, so the chemical becomes more concentrated at each step of the food chain.Case 3: Food additives, supplements and medicines
- Food additives such as preservatives (sodium benzoate), sweeteners and colours are assessed by Health Canada before they are allowed. Preservatives reduce food spoilage and food poisoning. Some people are sensitive to particular additives, which is why ingredients must be listed on labels. The 2018 ban on partially hydrogenated oils (Lesson 6) shows that a permitted ingredient can be removed when evidence of harm grows.
- Supplements are regulated in Canada as natural health products. "Natural" does not automatically mean safe or effective; look for the eight-digit NPN (Natural Product Number) on the label and for evidence from reliable studies.
- Medicines such as ASA and acetaminophen relieve pain and fever, but every medicine has risks: too much acetaminophen can seriously damage the liver. Read the label, follow the dose, and dispose of unused medicines through a pharmacy take-back program, never down the drain.
Case 4: Industrial chemicals and communities
Sarnia, on the St. Clair River, is home to one of Canada's largest concentrations of petrochemical plants, sometimes called "Chemical Valley". During the Second World War, the federally created Polymer Corporation began making synthetic rubber there, and the industry grew into a major employer.
Aamjiwnaang First Nation is located right beside many of these facilities. Community members have raised concerns about air pollution and health for many years. In April 2024, after high levels of benzene (a carcinogen, Lesson 4) were measured, Aamjiwnaang declared a state of emergency; the Ontario government ordered a nearby styrene plant to stop operating while the problem was addressed, and the federal government ordered Sarnia-area facilities to reduce benzene leaks. The situation shows why exposure matters: the same chemicals that are useful products can be a daily risk for the people who live closest to where they are made.
Forever chemicals. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are organic compounds with many very strong C–F bonds. They resist water, grease and heat, which is why they were used in non-stick coatings, stain repellents, some food packaging and firefighting foams. The same strong bonds make them extremely persistent. In March 2025 the federal government concluded that PFAS as a class (except fluoropolymers) can harm human health and the environment and proposed managing them as toxic substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.
Evaluating information (A1.9)
On topics like these you will find strong opinions online. Ask:
- Who wrote it, and why? A company selling a product, an advocacy group and a government agency may all present facts selectively.
- Is it evidence or opinion? Look for data, sample sizes and references to peer-reviewed studies.
- Is the hazard confused with the risk? "Contains a chemical linked to cancer" says nothing about exposure.
- Is it current? Regulations change; check the date and the government source (Health Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ontario ministries).
- Do several independent, reliable sources agree?
Record your sources with full citations (A1.7) so others can check them.
Worked exampleExample 1: Assessing a risk
A family uses a solvent-based paint (containing toluene and other organic solvents) to repaint a basement bedroom in January with the windows closed. Assess the risk and suggest two ways to reduce it.
- Hazard: organic solvent vapours can cause headaches, dizziness and nausea, and some are harmful with long exposure. They are also flammable.
- Exposure: a small, closed room in winter, so vapour concentrations build up; the person painting breathes them for hours; others may sleep there soon after.
- Risk: relatively high, because both the hazard and the exposure are significant.
- Reduce it: choose a low-VOC (volatile organic compound) water-based paint; ventilate with a fan and an open window on a mild day; take breaks; keep flames away; let the room air out before sleeping in it.
Moderate-to-high risk because of high exposure; reduce it by lowering the hazard (low-VOC paint) and lowering exposure (ventilation, time).
Worked exampleExample 2: Persistence and structure
Use structure to explain why a polyester such as PLA can be composted industrially while polyethene persists for a very long time.
- PLA has ester links in its backbone; water (with heat and microbes in an industrial composter) can hydrolyse them, breaking the chain into small molecules.
- Polyethene has only C–C and C–H bonds; there are no links that water can attack, and few microbes can digest it.
Ester links can be hydrolysed; an all-carbon backbone cannot, so polyethene persists.
Your personal action plan (B1.2)
Small choices, multiplied across millions of people, make a difference. Examples of actions that reduce harmful organic compounds:
- Weed by hand or use mulch instead of using herbicides.
- Bring reusable bags, bottles and containers; avoid single-use plastics when practical.
- Choose walking, cycling, transit, car-pooling or a fuel-efficient, hybrid or electric vehicle to cut fuel combustion.
- Take household hazardous waste (paint, solvents, batteries, pesticides) to your municipality's depot, and unused medicines to a pharmacy.
- Choose low-VOC paints, fragrance-free products if you are sensitive, and cleaning products you actually need.
- Read labels and look up unfamiliar ingredients in reliable sources.
A good action plan is specific (what, when, how much), realistic, and measurable (how will you know it worked?).
Careers and Canadian contributions (A2.1, A2.2)
Organic chemistry leads to many careers:
- Pharmacist (university degree in pharmacy and provincial licensing) and pharmaceutical chemist (B.Sc., often a graduate degree), who design and test medicines.
- Chemical engineer (B.Eng. and P.Eng. licence), who design plants such as those in Sarnia, and process operators and chemical technologists (college diploma programs).
- Polymer and materials scientists, who develop new plastics, including biodegradable ones.
- Environmental chemists and toxicologists, who measure pollutants and assess risks for governments and communities.
- Food scientists and flavour chemists, forensic scientists, and agricultural scientists.
In Ontario, chemists can earn the professional designation P.Chem. through the Association of the Chemical Profession of Ontario.
Canadian contributions: in 1953, Raymond Lemieux and his team at the National Research Council laboratory in Saskatoon achieved the first chemical synthesis of sucrose (table sugar), a landmark in carbohydrate chemistry. Lemieux later led chemistry research at the University of Alberta. The University of Toronto team of Banting, Best, Collip and Macleod isolated insulin, a protein, in 1921–1922, and Sarnia's wartime synthetic rubber industry was a major Canadian achievement in polymer production.
Hands-on activityHousehold organic-compound audit and action plan
You need: a notebook or spreadsheet, access to product labels in your home (read only; do not open or mix products), and internet access for research. Grown-up note: cleaning products, solvents and pesticides should stay closed and in their storage place; this activity only reads labels.
- Audit: list 10 products that contain organic compounds: for example plastic containers (resin codes), cleaners, paints, lawn and garden products, personal-care products, fuels and medicines.
- For each, record: what it is used for, the main organic ingredient or polymer (if listed), the hazard symbols on the label, and how it is disposed of.
- Assess: choose the three products you think carry the most risk for your household or the environment. For each, explain the hazard and the exposure in one or two sentences.
- Research: for one of the three, find two reliable sources (at least one government source). Cite them fully and note any bias.
- Plan: write a personal action plan with three specific, measurable actions (for example: "Replace plastic sandwich bags with two reusable containers starting Monday; count bags saved each week for a month.").
What to look for: a strong plan names a real product and a realistic replacement, explains the chemistry ("PE bags persist because their C–C backbone does not hydrolyse"), and says how success will be measured. Good sources include Health Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ontario government pages and peer-reviewed articles.
Just for funThe saying "the dose makes the poison" applies even to water: drinking far too much, far too fast, can be dangerous. Chemistry has no completely safe or completely dangerous substances, only amounts and exposures.
Your turn
1Explain the difference between hazard and risk, using gasoline as an example.
Hazard: gasoline is flammable and its vapours (including benzene) are toxic. Risk depends on exposure: gasoline stored sealed in an approved can in a detached shed has a low risk; spilling it in a closed garage with a running furnace is a high risk.
2Why do persistent, fat-soluble chemicals biomagnify?
They are not broken down or excreted quickly, so they build up in fatty tissue. Each predator eats many prey and keeps their chemical load, so the concentration rises at each level of the food chain.
3Give two benefits and two risks of plastic packaging.
Benefits: keeps food fresh and safe; light and cheap to transport (also: sterile medical packaging). Risks: persists for a very long time as litter; breaks into microplastics; made mainly from fossil fuels.
4Which Canadian regulation banned microbeads, and in what kind of product?
The federal microbeads regulations (2018) banned microbeads in toiletries such as face scrubs and toothpaste.
5State three questions to ask when judging an online claim about a chemical.
Any three: Who wrote it and why (bias)? Is it based on evidence (data, peer review)? Does it confuse hazard with risk? Is it current? Do other reliable sources agree?
6Name two careers that use organic chemistry and the training each needs.
For example: pharmacist (university pharmacy degree and licensing); chemical technologist (college diploma). Others: chemical engineer (B.Eng., P.Eng.), environmental chemist (B.Sc. or graduate degree).
More practice: warm-up
1What does "persistent" mean for a chemical?
It lasts a long time in the environment without breaking down.
2What size are microplastics?
3What does PFAS stand for?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
4Name one action that reduces herbicide use at home.
Weeding by hand (or using mulch).
5Which Canadian chemist made the first synthesis of sucrose?
Raymond Lemieux (1953, National Research Council, Saskatoon).
More practice: on your own
1Use bond strength to explain why PFAS are called "forever chemicals".
PFAS contain many C–F bonds, among the strongest single bonds in organic chemistry. Water, light and microbes can hardly break them, so PFAS are extremely persistent.
2Why might the same chemical release be a bigger concern for Aamjiwnaang First Nation than for a town 100 km away?
Exposure is much higher close to the source: people living beside the plants breathe higher concentrations, more often, for years. The hazard is the same, but the risk is greater.
3A website selling a "chemical-free" cleaner says ordinary cleaners are "full of toxins". Evaluate the claim.
Everything, including water and the cleaner itself, is made of chemicals, so "chemical-free" is meaningless. The site has a financial interest (bias), uses vague language ("toxins"), and does not separate hazard from exposure or give evidence. Check the ingredients with reliable sources instead.
4Write one specific, measurable action-plan item to reduce fuel combustion.
Example: "I will walk or cycle to school instead of being driven on at least three days a week from April to October, and record the distance in a log." (Any specific, measurable, realistic action is acceptable.)
5Explain how the 2018 trans fat ban connects to an organic reaction you studied.
Partial hydrogenation (an addition reaction of H₂ to C=C bonds in oils) converted some cis double bonds to trans double bonds. Evidence linked trans fats to heart disease, so Canada banned partially hydrogenated oils.
Challenge
1A town must choose between two lawn-care policies: (A) allow a herbicide with low toxicity to mammals but moderate persistence in soil, or (B) ban it and pay for manual weeding and overseeding in parks. Give a structured assessment (benefits, risks, who is affected, evidence needed) and a recommendation.
A: benefits: cheaper, effective weed control; risks: persistence means runoff into streams and effects on non-target plants and insects; affected: park users, children and pets, aquatic life. B: benefits: no chemical exposure, healthier soil; risks: higher labour cost, possibly more weeds. Evidence needed: the herbicide's half-life in local soil, measured runoff levels, toxicity to aquatic organisms, cost estimates. Recommendation (one reasonable answer): option B in parks and playgrounds where children are exposed, as Ontario's cosmetic pesticide ban already does for most lawn uses; review with monitoring data. Any well-supported recommendation is acceptable.
2Compare the environmental persistence of nylon-6,6, polyethene and PLA, using the bonds in their backbones.
Polyethene: C–C backbone, no hydrolysable links → most persistent. Nylon-6,6: amide links can be hydrolysed, but slowly at normal conditions → persistent, but less so in principle. PLA: ester links hydrolyse more readily, especially in warm, moist industrial composting → least persistent of the three. (In a cold lake or landfill, even PLA breaks down slowly.)
3Design a simple investigation (question, variables, method outline and safety) to compare how much microplastic fibre is released when a polyester fleece is washed in cold vs warm water.
Question: Does wash temperature affect how many fibres a polyester fleece sheds? Independent: water temperature (cold vs warm). Dependent: mass (or count) of fibres collected. Controlled: same fleece size and type, same amount of water, same detergent amount, same agitation time. Method: wash identical fleece samples in jars of water (shaken for the same time) or in a washing machine with a fine filter bag on the drain hose; filter the water through a coffee filter; dry and weigh (or count fibres under a magnifier); repeat 3 times. Safety: handle hot water carefully with a grown-up; use only household detergent; wash hands. Expect possible errors from loose lint and small masses; a sensitive balance (0.01 g) helps.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which statement best describes risk?
2. Why do DDT levels increase up a food chain?
3. Why are most common plastics persistent in the environment?
4. Which action is part of a reasonable personal plan to reduce harmful organic compounds?
5. Which source is likely the most reliable for current Canadian rules on a pesticide?
6. What chemical feature makes PFAS so persistent?
For parents and teachersBig ideas (B1.1, B1.2): organic compounds bring great benefits and real risks. Risk depends on hazard and exposure; persistence, bioaccumulation and biomagnification can spread harm. Students should evaluate evidence, recognize bias, and make a realistic personal action plan.
How to help: Do the household audit together. Let your teen lead the label reading, and discuss which actions your family could actually take. Help them find government sources and judge online claims.
Common difficulties:
- Treating "chemical" as a synonym for "harmful" (everything is made of chemicals).
- Confusing hazard with risk.
- Action plans that are vague ("use less plastic") instead of specific and measurable.
Sensitive topic: the Sarnia case involves the health concerns of a real First Nation community today. Discuss it respectfully, as an example of how the location of industry affects who carries the risk, and encourage your teen to read the community's own statements and news from reliable outlets.
Safety: the audit is read-only. Keep cleaners, solvents and pesticides closed, labelled and out of reach of children.