Grade by Grade
E. The World since 1900 · The World since 1900

The World since 1991, and Using History Skills Today

E2 E1 A1.7 A1.8 A2About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe major developments in the world since 1991.
  • I can evaluate predictions and interpretations about the recent past.
  • I can check online claims using historical thinking skills.
  • I can identify careers and university paths that use historical inquiry skills.

Words to know

unipolar
A world with one dominant superpower.
terrorism
The use of violence against civilians to create fear for political goals.
annexation
Taking over another country's territory and declaring it part of one's own.
Responsibility to Protect
The principle that the international community should act when a state fails to protect its people from mass atrocities.
democratic backsliding
The weakening of democratic institutions, such as courts, elections and a free press.
misinformation
False or misleading information, whether spread on purpose or not.
transferable skill
A skill that can be used in many different jobs and settings.

History that is still happening

When the Soviet Union dissolved in December 1991, some people believed the world had entered a peaceful new era. The American political scientist Francis Fukuyama had asked in a famous 1989 essay whether the world had reached "the end of history": the final victory of liberal democracy and market economies. Another scholar, Samuel Huntington, predicted instead a "clash of civilizations" (1993). The decades since have proved more complicated than either prediction. This lesson surveys the world since 1991 and asks you to use historical thinking on events that are still unfolding.

A new world order?

  • The United States became the only superpower. NATO and the European Union expanded east: ten countries joined the EU in 2004, most of them former communist states. The United Kingdom left the EU on January 31, 2020 ("Brexit").
  • Yugoslavia broke apart in wars from 1991 to 2001. In Bosnia (1992–1995) about 100 000 people were killed, including at Srebrenica. NATO bombed Serbia in 1999 over Kosovo.
  • Rwanda (1994) and the wars in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (from 1996), in which millions died, mostly from disease and hunger, showed the limits of international action. In response, the UN endorsed the principle of the Responsibility to Protect in 2005, based on the work of a commission sponsored by Canada.
  • South Africa became a democracy in 1994, and many countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia held competitive elections. Since the mid-2000s, organizations that measure democracy have reported declines in many countries.

Terrorism and war

  • On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners and killed nearly 3000 people in the U.S., including 24 Canadians.
  • A U.S.-led coalition, including Canada, overthrew the Taliban government in Afghanistan in 2001. Canada's military mission lasted until 2014; 158 Canadian soldiers died. The Taliban retook Kabul on August 15, 2021, as U.S. forces withdrew.
  • The U.S. and Britain invaded Iraq in 2003; Canada did not take part. Years of insurgency and sectarian war followed, and the group calling itself Islamic State rose from the chaos.

Rising powers and new rivalries

  • China became the world's second-largest economy (passing Japan around 2010). Under Xi Jinping (leader since 2012), China launched the Belt and Road Initiative (2013), built up its military, imposed a National Security Law on Hong Kong (2020), and faced international criticism over the treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang; in 2022 the UN human rights office reported serious human rights violations there.
  • Russia recovered from the economic collapse of the 1990s under Vladimir Putin (president from 2000). It fought wars in Chechnya and Georgia (2008), annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, and launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the largest war in Europe since 1945. Millions of Ukrainians became refugees, and many came to Canada. As of October 2026, U.S.-led talks and short truces had not produced a peace agreement, and fighting continued.
  • India, the world's most populous country since 2023, and other states of the Global South have grown in economic and diplomatic weight.
The world since 1991 (not to scale)1991USSR ends;Yugoslav wars2001September 11attacks2008Global financialcrisis2011Arab Spring2014Russia annexesCrimea2020COVID-19pandemic2021Taliban retakeKabul2022Russia invadesUkraine
These events are recent, so historians are still debating their significance. Notice how many involve conflict between states after a decade of hopes for peace.

Interpreting the recent past

Writing about the recent past is difficult: many archives are still closed, the outcomes are not yet known, and we are all affected by the events. Historians still apply their tools:

  • Significance: Which events will matter in 50 years? (September 11? The 2008 crisis? The smartphone? Climate change?)
  • Continuity and change: Is great-power rivalry between the U.S., China and Russia a return to the past?
  • Perspective: The 1990s look like an age of peace from Western Europe, but not from Rwanda, Bosnia or Chechnya.
  • Evidence: today we have more information than ever, and more misinformation. Checking sources is a vital skill.
Checking a claim online: the SIFT moves (Mike Caulfield)SStop: noticeyour reactionIInvestigatethe sourceFFind bettercoverageTTrace claims tothe originalThe same habits historians use with primary sources, applied to today's news.
SIFT is a quick routine for checking claims online. Notice that it begins with stopping: strong emotions are a signal to slow down.

Your history skills beyond school (A2)

The skills you practised in this course are valued in many careers and in university study:

  • Formulating questions and gathering evidence: research in any field, journalism, law.
  • Assessing credibility and bias: fact-checking, intelligence analysis, consumer decisions, voting.
  • Using perspective: diplomacy, social work, business with international partners, health care.
  • Building arguments and communicating: law, policy, teaching, writing, presenting.

In Canada, history graduates work in law, government (for example, Global Affairs Canada, Library and Archives Canada, Parks Canada), journalism, museums and archives, teaching, business, and Indigenous land-claim and treaty research. University history courses build directly on CHY4U: expect more primary sources, longer research papers and Chicago-style footnotes.

Where historical thinking skills are used (A2)Law and justicelawyers, judges,paralegals, treatyand land-claimresearchersMediajournalists, fact-checkers, podcastand documentaryproducersGovernmentpolicy analysts,diplomats,intelligenceanalystsHeritagearchivists,museum curators,heritage planners,genealogistsEducationteachers,professors,librarians,researchersAll of these use evidence, credibility checks, perspective and clear communication.
Historical thinking is not only for historians. Which column interests you most?
Worked example

Modelled example: Evaluating predictions about the future (A1.7)

In 1989, Fukuyama suggested liberal democracy might be the final form of government. In 1993, Huntington predicted conflicts between civilizations. Using evidence since 1991, evaluate both.

  1. Restate each claim accurately: Fukuyama argued that no rival ideology had a better claim than liberal democracy, not that events would stop. Huntington argued that cultural and religious identities would replace ideology as the main source of conflict.
  2. Evidence for Fukuyama: many countries democratized in the 1990s; market economies spread, including in China and India.
  3. Evidence against Fukuyama: democratic backsliding in many countries since the 2000s; China's growth under one-party rule; Russia's authoritarian turn.
  4. Evidence for and against Huntington: some conflicts involved religious and cultural identity (September 11, the Islamic State); but many of the deadliest conflicts were within civilizations (Rwanda, the Congo, Syria, Russia's war on Ukraine).
  5. Conclude: neither prediction fits well; recent history shows the continuing power of nationalism, great-power rivalry and economic change.

Sample conclusion: Both models were useful prompts, but the evidence since 1991 supports neither fully. Nationalism and great-power competition, older forces from earlier in this unit, have proved more powerful than either expected.

Just for fun

A punctuation lesson: Fukuyama's famous 1989 essay was titled "The End of History?", with a question mark. Many people who quote it forget the question mark, which changes the meaning from a prediction to a question.

Hands-on activity

Write a history of this week

You need: two credible news sources (for example, CBC and Reuters), a notebook.

  1. Choose one international story from this week.
  2. Use the SIFT moves to check one key claim in it.
  3. Write a 200-word "history" of the event as if you were a historian writing in 2050: what caused it, who was involved, and why it might be significant. Use cautious language where the outcome is unknown.
  4. List three primary sources a future historian might use (for example, official statements, videos, social media posts, interviews), and one reason each might be biased.
  5. Add a citation for each news source.

What to look for: a checked claim, cause and consequence, appropriate caution, three primary-source ideas with bias noted, and correct citations.

Your turn

1

What did Fukuyama ask in 1989?

2

When did the U.K. leave the European Union?

3

What happened on September 11, 2001?

4

When did the Taliban retake Kabul?

5

What happened on February 24, 2022?

6

What does SIFT stand for?

7

Name three careers that use historical thinking skills.

More practice: warm-up

1

When did Russia annex Crimea?

2

Who has been president of Russia since 2000 (apart from 2008–2012)?

3

Which principle did the UN endorse in 2005?

4

How many Canadian soldiers died in the Afghanistan mission?

5

Which country became the world's most populous in 2023?

More practice: on your own

1

Why is it hard for historians to write about very recent events?

2

Give evidence for and against the claim that the 1990s were a peaceful decade.

3

How did September 11 change international affairs?

4

Explain how one historical thinking skill helps you as a citizen.

5

Why might India's and China's growth change world politics?

Challenge

1

Choose one event since 1991 and argue whether it is a turning point, using the criteria of significance.

2

Use continuity and change: is the rivalry between the U.S., China and Russia a "new Cold War"?

3

Write a thesis connecting a theme from 1900 to the present (for example, empire, nationalism or human rights).

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which scholar predicted a "clash of civilizations"?

2.

Which statement about Canada and the 2003 invasion of Iraq is correct?

3.

When did Russia launch its full-scale invasion of Ukraine?

4.

What is the first step of the SIFT method?

5.

Why are recent events hard for historians to judge?

6.

Which principle, based on a Canadian-sponsored commission, did the UN endorse in 2005?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: The world since 1991: conflict and cooperation (E2) and major political and economic developments (E1), with a focus on applying historical skills to current events and careers (A2), drawing conclusions (A1.7) and communicating (A1.8).

How to help: Read or watch one international news story together this week and practise the SIFT moves. Talk about careers your teen is considering and how history skills fit.

Common difficulties:

  • Treating news reports as finished history.
  • Getting recent dates mixed up; the timeline helps.
  • Thinking history skills are only for future historians.

Time-sensitive facts (checked October 2026): no peace agreement had ended the war in Ukraine; check current news before relying on this.