Grade by Grade
D. Earth and Space Science: Climate Change · Climate Change

Effects of Climate Change Around the World: Weighing Harms and Benefits

D1.1 A1.7 A1.9About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can analyse current and potential effects of climate change, both positive and negative, on human activities and natural systems.
  • I can trace a chain of effects from a climate change to natural systems and human activities.
  • I can describe examples from the Arctic, drylands, low-lying coasts and farming regions, including effects on Inuit communities, food security, health and growing seasons.
  • I can organize research from reliable sources to analyse a climate effect.

Words to know

effect (impact)
A consequence of climate change for natural systems or human activities.
natural system
An ecosystem or physical system such as a forest, wetland, coral reef or sea-ice environment.
desertification
The degradation of land in dry regions, caused by climate variations and human activities such as overgrazing, so that it loses productivity.
food security
When all people at all times have access to enough safe, nutritious food.
storm surge
A rise in sea level during a storm caused by strong winds pushing water toward the shore and low air pressure.
saltwater intrusion
Movement of seawater into fresh groundwater or soils.
water-borne disease
An illness spread through contaminated water, such as cholera.
growing season
The part of the year when temperatures allow plants to grow, often measured as the frost-free period.

Let's start with a ship

For centuries, European explorers searched for a sea route through the Arctic, the Northwest Passage. Most expeditions were stopped by ice, and some ended in disaster. Today, in late summer, ships regularly sail through Canada's Arctic waters, including cargo ships and cruise ships.

Is that good news or bad news? It depends on who you ask and what you look at: shorter shipping routes and new jobs, or oil-spill risks, noisy waters for whales, and less sea ice for the people and animals that depend on it. Most effects of climate change are like this. In this lesson you'll learn to analyse effects carefully: positive and negative, on people and on natural systems, around the world.

Remember from Grade 9

In Grade 9 you assessed impacts on ecosystems in Ontario and around the world, and on communities in Canada, including First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities, using exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Here the focus is on analysing effects worldwide, including positive ones, and following chains of cause and effect.

How to analyse an effect

For any effect, ask:

  1. What climate change drives it? (warming, less ice, sea-level rise, heavier rain, drought)
  2. What is affected? A natural system (an ecosystem or species) or a human activity (farming, fishing, travel, health, housing, culture)?
  3. Positive or negative, and for whom? The same change can help one group and harm another.
  4. Current or potential? Is it already happening (with evidence), or projected?
  5. How serious, and who is most vulnerable?

The Arctic: sea ice, wildlife and Inuit communities

The Arctic is warming much faster than the global average. Effects include:

  • Natural systems: polar bears hunt seals from sea ice; ringed seals raise pups in snow dens on the ice; walrus rest on ice between dives. Shorter ice seasons reduce hunting time and habitat. Some Arctic fish and seabirds are shifting their ranges, while species from the south move north.
  • Inuit communities: for Inuit, sea ice is a highway and a hunting ground. Thinner, less predictable ice makes travel more dangerous and harvesting harder, which affects food security, culture and the passing on of knowledge to young people. Permafrost thaw damages buildings, roads and airstrips. Inuit organizations and communities are leading responses, combining Inuit knowledge with new technology (such as the SmartICE ice-monitoring program you met in Grade 9) and advocating for their rights in national and international climate discussions.
  • Economy: a longer open-water season allows more shipping, tourism and resource development, which may bring jobs and lower costs for northern resupply, but also risks of oil spills, accidents in remote waters, underwater noise that disturbs whales, and questions of Arctic sovereignty and who decides how northern waters are used.
Arctic warmingLess sea ice, for less timeNatural systemspolar bears and seals losehunting and resting ice;more open water absorbs heatInuit communitiesless safe, less predictableice travel; harvesting andfood security affectedShipping and economylonger shipping season (+);spill and safety risks,noise for whales (−)
One change, many effects. Shrinking Arctic sea ice affects natural systems, communities and the economy, and some effects are opportunities while others are harms. Analysing an effect means following the whole chain.
Worked example

Example 1: Analysing the Northwest Passage

Analyse the effect "a longer ice-free season in the Northwest Passage" using the five questions.

  1. Driver: Arctic warming, leading to less summer sea ice.
  2. Affected: human activities (shipping, tourism, resupply of northern communities, Inuit travel and harvesting) and natural systems (marine mammals, sea-ice ecosystems).
  3. Positive: shorter routes between Asia and Europe or eastern North America, possible jobs and cheaper sea resupply for northern communities.
  4. Negative: greater risk of fuel spills in remote, icy waters where cleanup is very hard; noise and ship strikes affecting whales; disturbance of areas important for Inuit harvesting; safety risks from drifting ice.
  5. Current or potential: shipping has already increased; larger increases are projected. Vulnerable: Inuit communities and Arctic marine life, which have the most at stake but don't control global shipping decisions.

A mixed effect: real economic opportunities, with serious environmental and community risks that require strong rules and Inuit involvement in decisions.

Drylands: drought, desertification and famine

About 40% of Earth's land is drylands, home to billions of people. In many dry regions, a warmer climate increases evaporation and makes droughts more severe. Combined with overgrazing, clearing vegetation and poor soil management, land can lose its productivity: desertification.

  • In the Sahel, the semi-arid belt south of the Sahara, severe droughts in the 1970s and 1980s caused famine. African countries are now working on the Great Green Wall initiative, launched by the African Union in 2007, to restore degraded land across the region.
  • In the Horn of Africa, five rainy seasons in a row failed between 2020 and 2023, leaving millions of people facing severe hunger and killing large numbers of livestock. Scientists who studied the drought found that human-caused climate change had made such a severe drought much more likely, mainly by increasing evaporation.

Losing arable land (land that can grow crops) threatens food security, especially where people depend on rain-fed farming and have few resources to adapt. Food shortages can push up prices worldwide and contribute to migration and conflict.

Low-lying coasts: flooding, disease and resettlement

Rising seas make storm surges reach farther inland. Low-lying coasts and river deltas are especially exposed.

  • Bangladesh sits on a huge, low river delta where millions of people live close to sea level. Cyclone storm surges, river floods and saltwater intrusion into wells and rice fields threaten homes, farms and drinking water.
  • Water-borne diseases such as cholera and other diarrheal diseases can spread after floods contaminate drinking water, and warmer water helps some harmful bacteria grow.
  • Resettlement: some communities are planning to move. The low-lying Pacific island nation of Tuvalu signed a treaty with Australia in 2023 (the Falepili Union) that includes a pathway for Tuvaluans to move to Australia, while Tuvalu also works to protect and adapt its islands.

Canada has coastal risks too: Atlantic communities face erosion and storm flooding made worse by sinking land (Lesson 13), and northern coastal communities face erosion as sea ice that once protected the shore disappears.

today's sea levelhigher sea levelhigher sea + storm surgehomes and fieldswellsalt water seeps into groundwaterEffects:flooding and erosionsalty wells and soilwater-borne disease risk
Schematic of a low-lying coast (not to scale). Higher seas let storm surges reach farther inland, flooding homes and fields, and salt water seeps into wells and farmland. Floodwater can spread water-borne diseases, and repeated flooding can force families to move.

Farming regions: longer growing seasons, with catches

In cool regions, including much of Canada, warming lengthens the growing season and increases growing degree days (Lesson 6). Frost-free seasons in parts of Canada are already longer than in the mid-1900s.

Possible benefits: crops that need longer seasons (corn, soybeans, some fruits) can be grown farther north, and farmers are exploring new farmland, including in northern Ontario's Clay Belt. Livestock may need less winter shelter.

Catches: more heat waves and droughts during the growing season; heavier rains that erode soil and delay planting; new pests and diseases that survive milder winters; northern soils that are often thinner, rockier or wetter than prairie or southern Ontario soils; and the loss of forests and peatlands if land is cleared (releasing carbon). In hot regions such as South Asia and parts of Africa, crops are already near their heat limits, so further warming tends to reduce yields.

Worked example

Example 2: A longer frost-free season

A town's average frost-free season was 135 days from 1961 to 1990 and 152 days from 1991 to 2020. (a) Find the percentage increase. (b) Give one benefit and two risks for a local farmer.

  1. (a) Increase = 152 − 135 = 17 days. Percentage = 17 ÷ 135 × 100% ≈ 12.6%.
  2. (b) Benefit: the farmer can grow a longer-season crop variety (for example, a corn hybrid that needs more growing degree days), possibly increasing yield.
  3. Risks: hotter, drier spells in summer may stress crops and require irrigation; new insect pests or plant diseases may survive the milder winters; heavier spring rain may delay planting or erode soil.

About a 12.6% longer season, with a mix of benefits and new risks.

Some benefitslonger growing seasonsin cool regions; lowerheating costs; longerArctic shipping seasonMany harmsheat waves; floods; drought;wildfires; sea-level rise;crop losses in hot regions;disease spread; habitat loss;damage to homes, roads andtraditional ways of life
Weighing effects. Some places and activities may gain from a warmer climate, but scientific assessments (such as the IPCC's) find that for most regions and people, the harms grow faster than the benefits as warming increases.

Putting it together

Across these examples, several patterns appear:

  • Benefits are real but limited, usually local, and often come with new risks.
  • Harms grow faster as warming increases, and some (species extinction, loss of glaciers, loss of land to the sea) can't be reversed on human time scales.
  • The most affected are often the least responsible: communities that have produced few emissions, such as Arctic communities and low-income countries, often face the biggest impacts and have fewer resources to adapt. This raises questions of fairness, which you'll consider when assessing initiatives in Lesson 16.
Just for fun

Riddle: I'm a Canadian farmer's new best friend, and also their new worst enemy. I let you plant earlier, but I also invite the bugs to stay all winter. What am I?

A warmer climate: a classic "good news, bad news" guest.

Hands-on activity

Climate effect analysis organizer (A1.7, A1.9)

You need: internet access with a grown-up's OK, a notebook or document.

  1. Choose one region or topic: Arctic sea ice and Inuit communities; the Sahel or the Horn of Africa; Bangladesh or a Pacific island nation; Canadian Prairie or northern Ontario farming; coral reefs; mountain glaciers and water supply (for example, in the Rockies or the Himalayas).
  2. Find at least three reliable sources (for example: a government agency, a university, the IPCC, a recognized international organization, or an organization representing the affected community). For each, record the author or organization, date, and why it is reliable. Note any possible bias (A1.9).
  3. Make a table with columns: Effect | Natural system or human activity | Positive or negative (for whom?) | Current or projected | Evidence and source. Fill in at least five rows.
  4. Write a paragraph (150 to 200 words) that analyses the effects: Which are most serious? Who is most vulnerable, and why? Are there any benefits, and do they outweigh the harms?

What to look for: at least five specific effects, a mix of natural and human, honest treatment of benefits, named and evaluated sources, and a conclusion supported by evidence. When writing about Indigenous communities, use specific names, present tense, and sources from the communities themselves where possible.

Your turn

1

List the five questions to ask when analysing a climate effect.

2

Give one positive and two negative effects of a longer ice-free season in the Arctic.

3

What is desertification, and what causes it?

4

Explain how sea-level rise can lead to water-borne disease.

5

Why might farmers in northern Ontario benefit from climate change, and what are the catches?

6

What does "the most affected are often the least responsible" mean? Give an example.

7

Is a longer growing season in Canada a reason not to worry about climate change? Explain.

More practice: warm-up

1

What is the name of the sea route through Canada's Arctic waters?

2

What is food security?

3

Name a semi-arid region south of the Sahara where severe droughts have caused famine.

4

What is saltwater intrusion?

5

Which Pacific nation signed the Falepili Union treaty with Australia in 2023?

More practice: on your own

1

A region's frost-free season grew from 120 to 138 days. Find the percentage increase.

2

Explain why the same change (warming) can be positive for a farmer in Manitoba and negative for a farmer in southern India.

3

Trace a chain of three effects starting from "more frequent droughts in a dryland region".

4

Why is an oil spill in Arctic waters especially serious?

5

Give one way the Great Green Wall initiative addresses desertification.

Challenge

1

Evaluate this statement: "Canada will be a climate change winner because of longer summers and an open Arctic." Use at least four pieces of evidence.

2

Explain why scientists describe some climate effects as "irreversible on human time scales", using two examples.

3

A news article says climate change "caused" a specific famine. A scientist says climate change "made the drought more likely and more severe". Why is the scientist's wording more accurate?

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which is a positive effect of climate change for some human activities?

2.

How does shrinking sea ice affect many Inuit communities?

3.

Desertification is caused by...

4.

How can coastal flooding increase water-borne disease?

5.

A frost-free season increases from 140 to 161 days. What is the percentage increase?

6.

Which statement best reflects scientific assessments of climate effects?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: Climate change has many effects on natural systems and human activities. A few are positive in some places (longer growing seasons, a longer Arctic shipping season), but many are negative (habitat loss, threats to traditional ways of life, drought and desertification, coastal flooding, disease), and the harms grow with more warming. This covers D1.1.

How to help: Discuss a news story about a climate effect (a drought, flood, wildfire or Arctic story) and ask your teen to apply the five questions. The research activity asks for reliable sources; help them check who wrote each source and why.

Common difficulties:

  • Seeing effects as only negative or only positive; good analysis considers both and asks "for whom?".
  • Saying climate change "caused" a single event, rather than making it more likely or more severe.
  • Writing about Indigenous communities only as victims; emphasize their knowledge, leadership and responses.