E. Canada, 1982 to the Present · Canada, 1982 to the PresentQuebec and the Constitution: Meech Lake and Charlottetown
E2.4 E2.3 E3.1 E1.4 A1.3 A1.5About 70 minutes
Learning goals- I can explain why the Mulroney government tried to bring Quebec into the Constitution.
- I can describe the main terms of the Meech Lake Accord and explain why it failed.
- I can explain Elijah Harper's role and why Indigenous peoples opposed the accord.
- I can compare the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords and explain the 1992 referendum result.
- I can assess a primary source for perspective and credibility.
Words to know
accord
A formal agreement, here between the prime minister and the premiers.
distinct society
A phrase recognizing that Quebec, with its French-speaking majority, civil law and culture, is different from the other provinces.
ratify
To formally approve an agreement, here by a vote in Parliament and each provincial legislature.
veto
The power to block a decision.
sovereignty
Full independence and control over one's own affairs; in Quebec, the goal of becoming an independent country.
federalist
A person who supports keeping Quebec inside Canada.
referendum
A vote by all eligible citizens on a single question.
Bloc Québécois
A federal political party formed in 1990 that runs candidates only in Quebec and supports Quebec sovereignty.
Unfinished business
Imagine your family signs a big new agreement about how the house will run, but one family member refuses to sign it, and the agreement applies to them anyway. Would that feel settled? That was Canada after 1982. The Constitution applied in Quebec, but Quebec's National Assembly had never agreed to it.
For the next ten years, Canadian leaders tried twice to fix this. Both attempts failed, and the failures pushed Canada closer to breaking apart than at any time since Confederation. This lesson tells that story and asks: why was it so hard to agree?
Mulroney's promise
In September 1984, Brian Mulroney, a bilingual lawyer from Baie-Comeau, Quebec, led the Progressive Conservatives to a huge majority. He won many seats in Quebec by promising to bring Quebec into the Constitution "with honour and enthusiasm."
In 1985, Quebec elected a federalist Liberal government under Robert Bourassa. In 1986 Bourassa's government listed five conditions for signing:
- recognition of Quebec as a distinct society;
- a veto for Quebec over constitutional amendments;
- a say in appointing the three Quebec judges on the Supreme Court;
- more power over immigration to Quebec;
- the right to opt out of new federal programs in provincial areas, with financial compensation.
The Meech Lake Accord (1987)
On April 30, 1987, Mulroney and all ten premiers met at Meech Lake in Gatineau Park, Quebec, and agreed to an accord that met all five conditions. To be fair to all provinces, several powers (such as suggesting Supreme Court judges) were given to every province, not only Quebec.
Because the accord changed the amending formula, it needed unanimous approval: Parliament and all ten provincial legislatures had to ratify it within three years, by June 23, 1990.
At first it looked easy. Then opposition grew:
- Pierre Trudeau, now retired, attacked the accord, arguing it would weaken the federal government and create two classes of provinces.
- New premiers were elected in New Brunswick (Frank McKenna), Manitoba (Gary Filmon) and Newfoundland (Clyde Wells). They were not bound by their predecessors' signatures. Newfoundland's legislature even cancelled its earlier approval in 1990.
- Women's groups worried the distinct society clause might be used to limit Charter equality rights in Quebec.
- First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders had been left out of the talks. The accord recognized Quebec as distinct but said nothing about the distinct societies of Indigenous peoples, who had been here first.
- In December 1988, Quebec used the notwithstanding clause to keep its law requiring French-only outdoor commercial signs (Bill 178), after the Supreme Court struck down part of its sign law. This angered many English-speaking Canadians and lowered support for Meech Lake outside Quebec.
Cause and consequence: follow the chain from Quebec's exclusion in 1982 to the death of the Meech Lake Accord and the rise of the Bloc Québécois.Elijah Harper and the deadline
Elijah Harper was an Oji-Cree man from Red Sucker Lake First Nation and a member of Manitoba's legislature. In June 1990, with only days left, Manitoba needed the unanimous consent of its members to skip the usual waiting periods and vote in time. Holding an eagle feather, Harper said "No" again and again. He explained that the accord ignored First Nations. Because of his stand, Manitoba could not vote before the deadline.
On June 22, 1990, Newfoundland's Premier Clyde Wells cancelled his legislature's vote. The next day, the Meech Lake Accord died.
To many First Nations people, Harper was a hero who showed that Indigenous peoples could not be left out of Canada's future. To many people in Quebec, the rejection felt like English Canada saying no to Quebec. Premier Bourassa told the National Assembly that, whatever happened, Quebec was "today and forever" a distinct society, free to choose its own future (English translations of his words vary).
Consequences in Quebec and Ottawa
- In May 1990, Lucien Bouchard, a powerful minister in Mulroney's cabinet, resigned. With other MPs from Quebec he formed the Bloc Québécois, a federal party working for Quebec sovereignty.
- Support for sovereignty in Quebec rose sharply in opinion polls in 1990 and 1991.
- Quebec passed a law promising a referendum by 1992 on either sovereignty or a new offer from the rest of Canada.
- Only weeks after Meech Lake died, the Oka crisis began (July 1990). Together, these crises showed that both Quebec and Indigenous nations wanted a new relationship with Canada.
The Charlottetown Accord (1992)
This time leaders tried to include more voices. The talks brought in the territorial leaders and national Indigenous organizations, including the Assembly of First Nations led by Ovide Mercredi. In August 1992 they agreed on the Charlottetown Accord. It included:
- a Canada Clause listing shared values, including Quebec as a distinct society, Indigenous peoples' rights, and the equality of provinces;
- an elected Senate with equal seats for each province (a major demand from the West);
- a guarantee that Quebec would always have at least 25% of the seats in the House of Commons;
- recognition of the inherent right of Indigenous self-government.
This time the accord was put directly to the people. On October 26, 1992, Canadians voted in a referendum (Quebec ran its own vote on the same question). The accord was rejected, with about 54% voting No across Canada. It lost in Quebec, the four western provinces, Nova Scotia and the Yukon.
A comparison organizer. Notice what Charlottetown added (a Senate deal for the West, Indigenous self-government, a national vote) and how it still failed.The national result. Many Quebec voters thought the accord gave Quebec too little; many voters in the West thought it gave Quebec too much. The same deal was rejected for opposite reasons.Worked exampleLet's assess a primary source (A1.3)
Source: Robert Bourassa's statement to Quebec's National Assembly on June 22, 1990, the day before the Meech Lake deadline: Quebec is "today and forever, a distinct society, free and capable of taking charge of its destiny and its development" (English translation).
Assess this source's perspective, purpose and reliability.
- Who created it, and when? The premier of Quebec, a federalist, speaking to Quebec's legislature as Meech Lake was failing.
- Purpose: To reassure Quebecers and show strength. He wanted Quebec to know he would defend its interests even though the accord had failed, and to warn the rest of Canada.
- Perspective and bias: It shows a Quebec federalist perspective. It does not tell us how Indigenous peoples, the other premiers or English-speaking Quebecers saw events.
- Reliability: It is very reliable evidence of what Bourassa said and the mood in Quebec's government. It is not reliable evidence of why the accord failed, because a speaker in the middle of a crisis presents his own side.
- Corroborate: Compare it with Elijah Harper's explanation, and with polls from 1990 showing rising support for sovereignty.
The source is a strong primary source for Quebec's official reaction and mood in June 1990, but it is one-sided. To understand the failure of Meech Lake, a historian must combine it with other perspectives.
Historical thinking: perspective (A1.5)
Historical perspective means understanding how people in the past saw events, given their values and situation, without judging them only by today's views. In 1990, a francophone in Quebec City, an Oji-Cree MLA in Winnipeg and a fisher in Newfoundland could all look at the same accord and see completely different things. A strong history answer names whose perspective it is describing.
Hands-on activityCan you get unanimous agreement?
You need: 3 to 5 people (family or friends), paper, and a timer.
- Each person takes a role: Quebec premier, Alberta premier, Newfoundland premier, Assembly of First Nations leader, and prime minister.
- On a card, each role writes its two top demands, using this lesson (for example, Quebec: distinct society and a veto; Alberta: an elected, equal Senate; Assembly of First Nations: self-government).
- Set a 10-minute timer. You must agree on a deal that everyone accepts. Anyone can say no.
- Afterwards, discuss: What did you give up? Was unanimity fair? Would the deal pass a referendum?
Look for: demands that match the real historical actors, and a reflection that explains why unanimity is so hard (each player has a veto). If you are alone, write the five demand cards and try to design a deal on paper.
Just for funThe Meech Lake Accord was named after a real lake in Gatineau Park where people go swimming every summer. Unfortunately, the accord itself never learned to stay afloat.
Your turn
1List Quebec's five conditions for signing the Constitution.
- Recognition as a distinct society. 2. A veto on constitutional amendments. 3. A role in appointing Quebec's Supreme Court judges. 4. More control over immigration. 5. The right to opt out of new federal programs with compensation.
2Why did the Meech Lake Accord need all ten provinces to agree?
Because it changed parts of the Constitution, including the amending formula, that require unanimous consent of Parliament and all ten legislatures.
3What was the deadline for ratifying Meech Lake?
June 23, 1990, three years after the accord was first approved by Quebec's legislature.
4Who was Elijah Harper, and what did he do?
An Oji-Cree member of Manitoba's legislature from Red Sucker Lake First Nation. He refused consent to speed up the vote, so Manitoba could not ratify the accord before the deadline. He objected that First Nations had been left out.
5Name the party Lucien Bouchard founded in 1990 and its main goal.
The Bloc Québécois, a federal party that works for Quebec sovereignty.
6Give two things the Charlottetown Accord added that Meech Lake did not have.
Any two: an elected, equal Senate; the inherent right of Indigenous self-government; a guaranteed 25% of House seats for Quebec; a Canada Clause; participation of Indigenous and territorial leaders; approval by a national referendum.
More practice: warm-up
1Who was prime minister during the Meech Lake and Charlottetown accords?
Brian Mulroney (Progressive Conservative).
2Who was premier of Quebec during Meech Lake?
Robert Bourassa (Liberal).
In Gatineau Park, Quebec, near Ottawa.
4On what date did Canadians vote on the Charlottetown Accord?
5Did the Charlottetown Accord pass?
No. About 54% voted No across Canada.
More practice: on your own
1Explain why many women's groups opposed the distinct society clause.
They worried a court could use it to let Quebec limit Charter equality rights, including women's rights, in the name of protecting Quebec's distinct society.
2How did Quebec's Bill 178 (1988) affect support for Meech Lake outside Quebec?
Quebec used the notwithstanding clause to keep French-only outdoor signs. Many English-speaking Canadians saw this as limiting the rights of Quebec's anglophone minority, and support for giving Quebec special recognition fell.
3Why did First Nations leaders oppose Meech Lake?
They were excluded from the negotiations, and the accord recognized Quebec as a distinct society while saying nothing about Indigenous peoples' distinct status and rights.
4Explain how the Charlottetown Accord was rejected "for opposite reasons."
Many voters in Quebec felt it gave Quebec too little power; many voters in the West felt it gave Quebec too much (such as the guaranteed 25% of seats). Opposite complaints added up to a No.
5Identify one short-term and one long-term consequence of the failure of Meech Lake.
Short-term: Bouchard and other MPs formed the Bloc Québécois, and support for sovereignty in Quebec jumped. Long-term: it set the stage for the 1995 referendum, which came very close to a Yes (next lesson).
Challenge
1Was Elijah Harper's action a cause of the failure of Meech Lake, or a trigger? Explain the difference using evidence.
Model answer: Harper's refusal was the immediate trigger that stopped Manitoba from voting by the deadline. The underlying causes were deeper: the unanimity rule, new premiers who opposed the deal, Newfoundland's withdrawal, anger over Bill 178, Trudeau's opposition, and the exclusion of Indigenous peoples. Even if Manitoba had voted, Newfoundland had cancelled its vote. So Harper was a significant trigger whose action highlighted a real underlying cause, but not the only cause.
2Assess this claim: "The Charlottetown Accord was more democratic than Meech Lake, so it should have succeeded."
Model answer: It was more inclusive (Indigenous and territorial leaders took part) and more democratic (a national referendum). But more voices meant a longer, more complicated deal with something for everyone to dislike, and a referendum let voters reject it for opposite reasons. Being more democratic made it more legitimate, but not more likely to pass. A strong answer agrees or disagrees and supports the judgement with evidence.
3Use the concept of continuity and change: what stayed the same and what changed in Quebec–Canada relations between 1982 and 1992?
Continuity: Quebec still had not signed the Constitution; the question of Quebec's status and powers stayed unresolved; unanimity remained very hard. Change: Indigenous leaders gained a seat at the table by 1992; a new sovereigntist party, the Bloc Québécois, sat in Ottawa; constitutional change now seemed to need a popular referendum, not just leaders' signatures.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which prime minister negotiated the Meech Lake Accord?
2. What phrase in the Meech Lake Accord described Quebec?
3. Why did Elijah Harper refuse consent in the Manitoba legislature?
4. What happened to the Meech Lake Accord on June 23, 1990?
5. Which was a feature of the Charlottetown Accord?
6. What was the result of the October 26, 1992 referendum?
For parents and teachersBig idea: E2.4 asks students to describe key developments in the relationship between Quebec and the federal government since 1982 from various perspectives. Meech Lake and Charlottetown are the core of that story, and Elijah Harper connects it to E2.3 (Indigenous relations). The worked example practises A1.3 (assessing sources).
Common difficulties:
- Mixing up the accords. Meech Lake (1987–1990) was a leaders' deal needing all legislatures; Charlottetown (1992) was a broader deal put to a referendum.
- Blaming one person. Students often say "Elijah Harper killed Meech Lake." Encourage them to separate the trigger from the underlying causes.
- One-sided answers. Ask: "How would someone in Quebec see this? Someone in Alberta? A First Nations leader?"
How to help: The role-play activity works well around a kitchen table. If relatives remember 1990 or 1992, ask them how they voted or felt, and talk about why people in different regions saw the same deal differently. Keep the discussion respectful: these are still sensitive topics in many families.