E. Canada, 1982 to the Present · Canada, 1982 to the PresentCanada, the United States and the World after 9/11
E3.4 E2.5 E1.4 E3.1 A1.3 A1.6About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can describe Canada's response to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the debates over security and rights that followed.
- I can describe Canada's mission in Afghanistan (2001–2014) and its decision not to join the Iraq War (2003).
- I can explain key issues in Canada–U.S. relations, including trade, the border, culture, the environment and Arctic sovereignty.
- I can explain how events in 2025 affected Canadian identity and Canada's relationship with the United States.
Words to know
terrorism
The use or threat of violence against civilians to achieve political, religious or ideological goals.
NORAD
The North American Aerospace Defense Command, a joint Canada–U.S. command that defends North American airspace.
sovereignty
A country's full authority over its own territory and decisions.
Northwest Passage
Sea routes through Canada's Arctic islands linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
softwood lumber
Wood from coniferous trees such as pine, spruce and fir, used in building; a major Canadian export.
cultural sovereignty
A country's ability to protect and promote its own culture, for example through Canadian content rules.
counter-insurgency
Military and civilian efforts to defeat an armed group that fights a government from among the population.
A town that doubled overnight
On September 11, 2001, terrorists of the group al-Qaeda hijacked four airplanes in the United States and killed nearly 3 000 people, including 24 Canadians. The U.S. closed its airspace. In Operation Yellow Ribbon, more than 200 flights headed for the U.S. were diverted to Canadian airports. In Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador, a town of about 10 000 people, residents welcomed about 6 500 stranded passengers and crew into schools, churches and homes for several days. Their story later became the musical Come From Away, written by Canadians Irene Sankoff and David Hein.
That moment showed the closeness of Canada and the United States. The years that followed tested that relationship: in a war in Afghanistan, a decision about Iraq, new rules at the border, and, in 2025, a trade war and talk of annexation.
Security after 9/11: safety and rights
Parliament passed the Anti-terrorism Act in December 2001, giving police new powers. Canada and the U.S. signed a Smart Border declaration to tighten security while keeping trade moving. By 2009, Canadians needed a passport (or similar document) to enter the U.S. by land.
Some cases raised serious questions about rights:
- Maher Arar, a Canadian engineer, was detained in New York in 2002 and sent by U.S. officials to Syria, where he was tortured. A Canadian inquiry (2006) found that inaccurate information from the RCMP had probably contributed, and that there was no evidence he was a threat. In 2007, Prime Minister Harper apologized, and Canada paid him compensation.
- Omar Khadr, a Canadian, was captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in 2002 at age 15, accused of killing a U.S. soldier, and held at Guantánamo Bay. In 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canadian officials had violated his Charter rights. In 2017, the government apologized and settled his lawsuit. Many Canadians agreed with the settlement because of the Charter violations and his age; many others strongly disagreed because of the charges against him.
The war in Afghanistan (2001–2014)
Afghanistan's Taliban government had sheltered al-Qaeda. After 9/11, a U.S.-led coalition, and later a NATO-led mission authorized by the UN, removed the Taliban from power. Canada's role changed over time:
- 2001–2002: special forces and an infantry battle group joined the first operations near Kandahar.
- 2003–2005: Canadian troops helped secure Kabul, the capital, as part of the NATO-led ISAF mission.
- 2006–2011: Canada took on a major combat and counter-insurgency role in Kandahar province, one of the most dangerous areas, along with reconstruction and development projects.
- 2011–2014: Canadians trained Afghan security forces. The mission ended in March 2014.
More than 40 000 Canadian Armed Forces members served. 158 were killed, and so were a Canadian diplomat, a journalist and several civilian workers. Many more returned with physical injuries or post-traumatic stress. The mission was debated at home: about its goals, its cost, and whether prisoners Canada handed to Afghan authorities were tortured. In August 2021, the Taliban took power again; Canada then resettled tens of thousands of Afghans, including interpreters who had worked with Canadian forces and their families.
Saying no: Iraq (2003)
In 2003, the U.S. and the U.K. prepared to invade Iraq, claiming it had weapons of mass destruction. On March 17, 2003, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien told the House of Commons that Canada would not take part without UN Security Council approval. The decision was popular in Canada, especially in Quebec, but strained relations with the U.S. administration. No weapons of mass destruction were found. In 2005, Paul Martin's government also declined to join the U.S. ballistic missile defence program.
Dates are evenly spaced, not to scale. The relationship has moved between close cooperation (2001) and serious tension (2003, 2025).Long-running Canada–U.S. issues
- Softwood lumber: U.S. lumber producers have argued since the early 1980s that Canada unfairly subsidizes lumber because most forests are publicly owned. The U.S. has repeatedly placed duties on Canadian lumber; agreements (such as in 2006) brought temporary peace. Duties rose sharply again in 2025.
- Protecting Canadian culture: with the U.S. media giant next door, Canada uses Canadian content rules, funding for artists, and laws such as the Online Streaming Act (2023). After the Online News Act (2023) required large tech platforms to pay news outlets, Meta blocked news on Facebook and Instagram in Canada. In June 2025, under U.S. pressure during trade talks, Canada cancelled its planned digital services tax on large tech companies.
- Environment: the International Joint Commission (created in 1909) helps manage shared waters. Canada and the U.S. signed the Air Quality Agreement (1991) to reduce acid rain, which had been damaging lakes and forests in Ontario and Quebec, and updated the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 2012.
- Arctic sovereignty: Canada says the Northwest Passage is Canadian internal waters; the U.S. says it is an international strait. As climate change melts sea ice, the question matters more. In 2022, Canada and Denmark (with Greenland) settled a friendly, nearly 50-year dispute over tiny Hans Island by dividing it.
- Defence: Canada and the U.S. share NORAD. The U.S. has long pushed Canada to spend more on defence; in 2025, Canada committed to reach NATO's spending target of 2% of GDP and to raise defence spending further over the following decade.
The relationship includes both deep cooperation and lasting friction. Historians look at both columns before judging it.2025: "Elbows up"
After returning to office in January 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian goods (Lesson 11) and repeatedly said Canada should become the "51st state." Many Canadians reacted strongly:
- Flags went up, shoppers chose Canadian products, provinces removed U.S. alcohol from store shelves, and many Canadians cancelled trips to the U.S. Statistics Canada reported large drops in return trips from the United States during 2025.
- "Elbows up," a hockey phrase, became a slogan for standing firm.
- The issue dominated the April 28, 2025 federal election, won by Mark Carney's Liberals (Lesson 16).
Historians will debate how lasting this surge in national feeling will be. It is a clear example of an outside challenge strengthening a sense of Canadian identity (E3.4).
Other international roles since 2001
- Humanitarian response: Canada sent its Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and the 2010 Haiti earthquake; many Haitian Canadians, especially in Quebec, helped family and communities.
- Libya (2011): a Canadian general, Charles Bouchard, commanded NATO's air mission.
- Fighting ISIS (2014 onward) and peacekeeping in Mali (2018–2019).
- Ukraine: after Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, Canada, home to one of the world's largest Ukrainian diasporas, gave military, financial and humanitarian support and welcomed many Ukrainians.
- Middle East: in September 2025, Canada formally recognized the State of Palestine, alongside the United Kingdom and Australia, while stating its support for Israel's security and calling for the release of hostages held by Hamas.
Canada's spending on development aid was cut in the 1990s, rose again in the 2000s, and has continued to be debated.
Worked exampleLet's weigh sources on the Afghanistan mission (A1.3, A1.6)
A student gathers four sources: (1) a 2007 government news release about schools built in Kandahar; (2) a 2009 letter from a soldier to his family; (3) a 2010 newspaper investigation into detainee transfers; (4) a 2021 Afghan interpreter's account of escaping the Taliban. How should she use them to answer: Was Canada's mission in Afghanistan a success?
- Source 1: useful for the government's goals and claims, but its purpose was to promote the mission, so check its claims against independent evidence.
- Source 2: a vivid primary source of one soldier's experience and feelings; it cannot tell us about the mission's overall results.
- Source 3: an independent investigation that raises human rights questions; check its evidence and the government's response.
- Source 4: shows a long-term Afghan perspective: the Taliban's return in 2021 and the personal risks faced by people who worked with Canadians.
- Synthesize: Define "success" first (military goals? reconstruction? long-term stability? Canada's alliances?). Then weigh the evidence: there were real achievements (schools, training, alliance commitments) but the Taliban's return in 2021 undid much of the mission's purpose.
Use all four sources together, judge each one's purpose and perspective, define clear criteria for "success," and reach a balanced, evidence-based conclusion, for example: "The mission achieved some short-term goals at a high cost, but did not achieve lasting stability."
Hands-on activityCross-border check-up
You need: internet access and a notebook.
- Choose one Canada–U.S. issue from this lesson (lumber, the Northwest Passage, culture and tech, the Great Lakes, or defence).
- Find one Canadian and one American news source about it from the last year.
- Make a two-column chart: How does each describe the issue? What does each want? What words show its perspective?
- Write a paragraph: How does this issue affect Canadian identity or sovereignty?
Look for: two dated, reliable sources from different countries; a clear comparison of perspectives; and a link to identity (E3.4).
Just for funFunny but true: the Haskell Free Library and Opera House sits right on the Canada–U.S. border, between Stanstead, Quebec, and Derby Line, Vermont. A line on the floor marks the border, so you can stand in one country and pull a book off a shelf in the other.
Your turn
1What was Operation Yellow Ribbon?
Canada's response on September 11, 2001, when more than 200 flights headed for the U.S. were diverted to Canadian airports, and communities such as Gander cared for stranded passengers.
2Why did Canada go to Afghanistan in 2001?
Afghanistan's Taliban government had sheltered al-Qaeda, which carried out 9/11. Canada joined its allies in the U.S.-led and then NATO-led, UN-authorized mission.
3How many Canadian Armed Forces members died in the Afghanistan mission?
4What did Jean Chrétien announce on March 17, 2003?
That Canada would not join the invasion of Iraq without UN Security Council approval.
5What is the softwood lumber dispute?
A long-running trade dispute: U.S. producers claim Canadian lumber is unfairly subsidized, so the U.S. places duties on it.
6What is the disagreement over the Northwest Passage?
Canada says it is Canadian internal waters; the U.S. says it is an international strait open to all ships.
More practice: warm-up
1Which Newfoundland town hosted thousands of stranded passengers on 9/11?
It is a joint Canada–U.S. command that defends North American airspace.
3When did Canada's mission in Afghanistan end?
4Which island did Canada and Denmark agree to divide in 2022?
5What hockey phrase became a slogan of Canadian resistance in 2025?
More practice: on your own
1Explain how the Maher Arar case showed a conflict between security and rights.
After 9/11, security agencies shared information quickly. Inaccurate information from the RCMP probably contributed to the U.S. sending Arar, a Canadian, to Syria, where he was tortured. An inquiry cleared him, and Canada apologized and paid compensation (2007). It showed how security measures can violate innocent people's rights.
2Why was Canada's decision on Iraq significant for its identity?
It showed Canada making an independent foreign policy choice, based on the need for UN approval, even when its closest ally disagreed. Many Canadians saw it as proof of sovereignty.
3Give one example of Canada–U.S. environmental cooperation.
The Air Quality Agreement (1991) to reduce acid rain; the International Joint Commission; the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (updated 2012).
4Why did Meta block news in Canada in 2023?
In response to the Online News Act, which required large platforms to pay news outlets for news content.
5How did Canadians respond to the 2025 tariffs and "51st state" remarks?
With a surge of national feeling: buying Canadian, removing U.S. alcohol from provincial stores, cancelling U.S. trips, and the slogan "Elbows up". It became a central issue in the April 2025 election.
Challenge
1Assess how Canada–U.S. relations affected Canadian identity between 2001 and 2025.
Model answer: 2001: Operation Yellow Ribbon and Gander showed Canadians as generous neighbours, building pride. 2003: staying out of Iraq strengthened an identity of independent, UN-based foreign policy. 2006–2011: the Afghanistan combat mission challenged the peacekeeper image and showed alliance loyalty. 2025: tariffs and annexation talk produced a strong wave of national unity. Overall: Canadian identity has often been defined in relation to the U.S., both through closeness and through difference.
2Should Canada have settled Omar Khadr's lawsuit in 2017? Present both perspectives, then give your judgement.
For the settlement: the Supreme Court ruled (2010) that Canadian officials violated his Charter rights; he was a child (15) when captured; going to trial would likely have cost more. Against: many Canadians believed he was responsible for a soldier's death and that compensation was wrong, especially for the soldier's family. A strong judgement explains that the settlement was about the government's violation of rights, and states a clear position supported by evidence.
3Was the Afghanistan mission consistent with Canada's "traditional" role in world affairs? Explain.
Model answer: Partly. It was consistent with Canada's tradition of working through alliances (NATO) and UN-authorized missions, and with reconstruction and development work. It was less consistent with the popular image of Canada as a peacekeeper, because 2006–2011 in Kandahar was intense combat. But Canada had also fought in both World Wars, Korea and the Gulf War, so combat was not new.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. What did Operation Yellow Ribbon involve?
2. In which Afghan province did Canada lead combat operations from 2006 to 2011?
3. Why did Canada not join the 2003 invasion of Iraq?
4. What is the main Canada–U.S. disagreement about the Northwest Passage?
5. Which agreement (1991) addressed acid rain?
6. What best describes Canadian reaction to the 2025 tariffs and "51st state" comments?
For parents and teachersBig idea: E3.4 asks students to describe key developments in Canada–U.S. relations since 1982 (trade, softwood lumber, culture, the IJC, 9/11, the refusal to join Iraq, Afghanistan, border issues, the Omar Khadr case, Arctic sovereignty) and their impact on identity. E2.5 covers Canada's international participation. Recent events (2025) are included with dates.
Sensitive content: The lesson mentions terrorism, war deaths and torture factually. The light fact is about a library on the border, not about war.
Common difficulties:
- Mixing up Afghanistan (Canada took part) and Iraq (Canada did not).
- Treating recent politics as settled. The 2025 events are recent; encourage your teen to separate facts (dates, decisions) from opinions about them.
- One-sided views on Khadr or the convoy-era debates. Insist on both perspectives.
How to help: If anyone in your circle served in Afghanistan, or travelled through Gander in 2001, their experiences are valuable (only if they want to share). Watching or listening to Come From Away together is a fun extension.