Writing · Writing: Essays and Literary AnalysisLiterary Analysis IV: Introductions, Alternative Interpretations, Conclusions and the Full Draft
2.1 2.7About 75 minutes
Learning goals- I can write an introduction that moves from a common reading of a text to my own thesis.
- I can use brief context to deepen, not replace, my analysis.
- I can present an alternative interpretation fairly and respond to it with evidence.
- I can write a conclusion that explains the significance of my argument without repeating it.
- I can produce a complete draft to the teacher's criteria, including under time limits.
Words to know
they say / I say
A way of framing an argument: first state a view others hold, then present your own claim in response to it.
alternative interpretation
A different, reasonable reading of the text that you present fairly and then answer with evidence.
concession
Admitting that part of another view is true or reasonable.
significance
Why your argument matters: what it changes about how we read the text or see the world.
criteria
The standards your work is assessed against, usually given in a rubric or success criteria.
draft
A complete version of the essay that you expect to revise; an essay usually goes through several.
From parts to a whole essay
You now have a complex thesis and layered body paragraphs. This lesson finishes the essay: an introduction that earns the thesis, a paragraph that takes on a different reading, a conclusion that says why the argument matters, and a full draft written to the criteria your teacher uses. Expectation 2.7 asks you to produce revised drafts of texts, including increasingly complex texts, written to meet criteria identified by the teacher. A full literary essay is exactly that kind of text.
Remember from Grade 10
In Grade 10 you built introductions with hook, bridge and thesis, wrote an alternative reading paragraph, ended with echo, synthesize and extend, and learned the four categories of Ontario's achievement chart (Knowledge and Understanding, Thinking, Communication, Application). Grade 11 adds the they say / I say introduction, alternative interpretations woven into the argument, and conclusions that explain significance.
The introduction: they say, I say
A Grade 11 introduction often works best when it starts from a common reading of the text (what they say) and then shows where your reading differs or goes further (what I say). The writing guide They Say / I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein made this move famous, because it shows your reader why your thesis is worth reading: it adds something to a conversation.
- The usual reading: how the text is commonly understood.
- The text: author's full name, title, form, year and only the context the reader needs.
- The tension: what the usual reading leaves out.
- Thesis: your claim. You may add a brief roadmap of your main points if your teacher wants one.
Avoid openings that could begin any essay: dictionary definitions, Since the dawn of time, or In this essay I will.
The introduction narrows from what many readers think to what you will prove. The tension in step 3 is what makes the thesis necessary.A model introduction:
For more than a century, "In Flanders Fields" has been recited at Remembrance Day ceremonies across Canada, and it is often remembered simply as a call to honour the dead by carrying on their fight. John McCrae, a Canadian army doctor, wrote the poem in 1915, giving voice to soldiers buried in Belgium who speak to the living from their graves. Yet the Dead spend most of the poem not urging but mourning: they remember dawn, sunset and love before they ever mention a quarrel. Although the Dead grieve the ordinary lives they lost, that grief becomes the force behind their demand, so the poem is a lament that obliges the living.
Context: a spice, not the meal
In the introduction above, context takes one sentence: who McCrae was, when he wrote, and who speaks. Context is useful when it explains something in the text. It is padding when it retells history the reader can find anywhere.
- Useful: McCrae wrote in 1915, early in the war, which helps explain why the Dead can still speak of a quarrel to be taken up.
- Padding: a paragraph about the battles of 1915.
Also keep the speaker and the poet separate. The poem is spoken by the Dead; write the speakers demand, not McCrae demands, unless you are discussing his choices as a writer (McCrae gives the Dead...).
The alternative interpretation
A Grade 11 essay is stronger when it takes on the best version of a different reading and answers it. You can give it its own paragraph or weave it into a body paragraph. Use four moves:
- State the other reading fairly, with the evidence that supports it.
- Concede what is true in it.
- Respond with evidence: what does that reading fail to explain?
- Return to your thesis, now strengthened.
A model alternative-interpretation paragraph:
Some readers may see the poem as straightforward wartime encouragement, and the poem was indeed widely quoted during the war to support the war effort. The commands of the final stanza, "Take up our quarrel" and "hold it high" (lines 10, 12), certainly sound like a recruiting appeal. However, this reading cannot account for why more than half of the poem, nine of its fifteen lines, is spent on loss before the cause is even mentioned. The Dead never name the cause, describe the enemy or mention victory; the only reward they imagine is being able to "sleep" (14). Read in full, the call to arms is less a celebration of war than a plea from the grieving, which is why it continues to move readers who do not share its wartime purpose.
The conclusion: significance, not summary
In Grade 10 you learned to echo, synthesize and extend. In Grade 11, focus the extension on significance: what does your reading change? Return to the tension you raised in the introduction and show that it has been resolved, or that it is the point. Do not add new evidence, and do not begin with In conclusion.
A model conclusion:
"In Flanders Fields" asks more of its readers than remembrance. By letting the Dead first recall the dawns, sunsets and loves they lost, McCrae turns their final command into something personal, and the image of a torch thrown from failing hands makes the obligation impossible to set down. The poem's lasting power may come from exactly this tension: it is spoken by people who want to rest, and it insists that their rest depends on the living.
A title that works
Many teachers expect a title. A useful pattern is an image or phrase from the text, a colon, and your claim in brief: "From Failing Hands": Grief and Obligation in "In Flanders Fields". Do not underline or bold your own title, and do not put it in quotation marks (only the quoted phrase from the poem goes in quotation marks).
Drafting to criteria
Before you draft, reread the teacher's criteria (rubric or success criteria). As you draft:
- Draft from your claim spine. Start with any body paragraph; many writers draft the introduction last.
- Keep moving. If you need a quotation you cannot find, write [QUOTE: torch line] and keep going; fill it in later.
- Check each paragraph against the Thinking criteria: is there analysis, not just evidence?
- Save versions (Flanders_v1, Flanders_v2) so you can compare and recover cut material.
A first draft is supposed to be imperfect. The next lessons on voice, sentences and revision are about making it better.
In a timed essay, planning is not lost time. Ten minutes on a claim spine usually saves far more than ten minutes of wandering.Worked exampleLet's assemble the essay plan and check it against criteria
Assemble the full plan for the Flanders essay and check it against a typical Grade 11 rubric (Knowledge and Understanding, Thinking, Communication, Application).
- Title: "From Failing Hands": Grief and Obligation in "In Flanders Fields".
- Introduction: usual reading (a call to remember and fight on) → text (McCrae, 1915, the Dead speak) → tension (they mourn more than they urge) → complex thesis.
- Body 1: the Dead define themselves by ordinary lives (lines 6-8) [layered paragraph from Lesson 5].
- Body 2: grief becomes command: the shift at line 10, the torch from failing hands (10-12).
- Body 3: the closing threat (We shall not sleep, 13-14) and the refrain make the call an obligation.
- Alternative interpretation: woven into Body 3 or as a short separate paragraph: the recruiting-appeal reading, conceded and answered.
- Conclusion: significance: people who want to rest insist their rest depends on the living.
- Criteria check. Knowledge and Understanding: accurate quotations and terms (refrain, imperative, metaphor). Thinking: complex thesis; alternative interpretation answered. Communication: formal voice, present tense, smooth transitions, correct citations. Application: connects the poem's tension to why it still moves readers today.
A five- or six-paragraph plan in which every rubric category has a place where it will be earned. The writer can now draft with confidence and revise against the same criteria.
Hands-on activityA timed mini-essay at the kitchen table
You need: a timer, lined paper, a pen, and a short poem or story you know (the McCrae poem works).
- Set the timer for 40 minutes. Use the same proportions as the diagram: about 5 minutes to plan, 30 minutes to write, 5 minutes to reread.
- Prompt: Analyze how the ending of the text changes the meaning of what came before it.
- Write an introduction (usual reading → text → tension → thesis), two body paragraphs and a short conclusion that explains significance.
- When the timer ends, stop. Then, with a different coloured pen, mark: the thesis, each topic sentence, one alternative interpretation (if you had time), and one place where you would add more analysis.
- Ask a family member to read only your introduction and tell you what they think the essay will argue.
What to look for: a thesis with a tension, at least two embedded quotations per paragraph, and a conclusion that does not just repeat the introduction.
Just for funPlease do not start your conclusion with In conclusion. Your reader can see there are no more paragraphs; they have eyes and a scroll bar. Starting a conclusion with In conclusion is like ending a phone call with This is the end of the phone call.
Your turn
1What are the four steps of a they say / I say introduction in this lesson?
The usual reading → the text (author, title, form, year) → the tension → the thesis.
2Why is a paragraph about the battles of 1915 not useful in this essay?
It is history, not analysis: it does not explain anything in the poem's language. Context should be brief and must deepen the analysis of the text.
3Name the four moves of an alternative-interpretation paragraph.
State the other reading fairly → concede what is true → respond with evidence → return to your thesis.
4Rewrite: McCrae demands that we keep fighting.
The Dead demand that the living keep fighting. (Or: McCrae gives the Dead a demand...) The speaker and the poet are not the same.
5Give two openings to avoid in an introduction.
Any two: dictionary definitions, Since the dawn of time, In this essay I will, a vague question such as Have you ever...?
6In a 75-minute in-class essay, about how long should you plan?
About 10 minutes (roughly the first 10 to 15 per cent of the time).
More practice: warm-up
Admitting that part of another view is true or reasonable.
2Should a conclusion introduce new evidence?
3What does significance mean in a conclusion?
Why the argument matters: what it changes about how we read the text or see the world.
4What should you write if you cannot find a quotation while drafting?
A placeholder such as [QUOTE: torch line], then keep drafting and fill it in later.
5Name the four categories of Ontario's achievement chart.
Knowledge and Understanding, Thinking, Communication, Application.
More practice: on your own
1Write a they say sentence for an essay about any well-known story, film or song.
Sample: Most viewers remember the film as a feel-good sports story about an underdog team that wins. It should state a common reading that your thesis will add to or challenge.
2Explain why the model alternative-interpretation paragraph is convincing rather than defensive.
It states the other reading fairly and gives it real evidence (the commands of stanza 3), concedes that the poem was used to support the war, then answers with evidence the other reading cannot explain (nine of fifteen lines are about loss; the cause is never explained, the foe is never described and victory is never mentioned). It returns to the thesis stronger.
3Rewrite this weak conclusion: In conclusion, the poem uses imagery, a shift and a metaphor to show grief and duty. These are the three ways.
Sample: "In Flanders Fields" endures because it refuses to separate mourning from obligation: the same voices that remember dawn and love hand the living a torch they cannot drop. To remember the Dead, the poem suggests, is to accept that their rest depends on us.
4Write a title for an essay on Owen's poem using the pattern quoted phrase: claim in brief.
Sample: "The Old Lie": How Owen Turns a Patriotic Slogan Against Itself. Only the quoted phrase is in quotation marks.
5A rubric's Thinking category says addresses complexity, including alternative interpretations. Where in your plan will you earn this?
In the complex thesis (which names a tension) and in the alternative-interpretation paragraph or section, where another reading is stated fairly and answered with evidence.
Challenge
1Write a complete they say / I say introduction (4 to 5 sentences) for the comparative essay on McCrae and Owen from Literary Analysis III.
Look for: a common view (the First World War is often remembered through a few famous poems); both texts introduced with authors' full names, titles and years; a tension (the poems ask readers at home for opposite responses); and a comparative thesis that states what the comparison reveals.
2Write an alternative-interpretation paragraph for the comparative essay: Some readers argue that McCrae and Owen are not really opposed, because both honour the soldiers. Concede and respond.
Sample: It is true that both poets honour the soldiers they describe: McCrae's Dead are dignified, and Owen's anger is on behalf of the men he fought beside. However, honouring the soldiers leads the poems to opposite conclusions. McCrae's Dead ask the living to "Take up our quarrel" (McCrae, line 10), while Owen calls the idea that such deaths are "sweet and fitting" "The old Lie" (Owen, line 27). Shared respect for the soldiers is precisely what makes their disagreement about what the living owe them so striking.
3Explain how drafting to criteria is different from writing first and checking the rubric at the end. Why is the first approach more efficient?
Drafting to criteria means you plan where each criterion will be earned before and during drafting (a thesis with a tension for Thinking, accurate terms for Knowledge, citations and transitions for Communication). Checking only at the end often reveals missing elements that require rewriting whole paragraphs. Building them in from the start saves time and produces a more complex draft.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. In a they say / I say introduction, the they say part is:
2. Which sentence uses context well in a literary essay?
3. The first move in answering an alternative interpretation is to:
4. A strong Grade 11 conclusion focuses on:
5. Which title is formatted correctly for your own essay?
6. Expectation 2.7 asks students to produce revised drafts written to meet:
For parents and teachersBig idea: This lesson completes the Grade 11 literary essay (expectation 2.1) and focuses on producing complete drafts to the teacher's criteria (expectation 2.7). Many Grade 11 courses include at least one in-class or timed essay; check your teen's course outline.
How to help: ask to see the rubric along with the draft. Together, find one place in the draft where each category is earned. Offer to time a practice essay; the 40-minute kitchen-table version in the activity is good preparation.
Common difficulties: generic openings; history paragraphs instead of analysis; treating the speaker as the poet; alternative readings that are set up weakly and knocked down (a straw man); conclusions that repeat the introduction; leaving the rubric until the end. The model paragraphs here were written for this site; students should not copy them into their own assignments.