Grade by Grade
Reading and Literature Studies · Reading Like a Grade 10 Critic: Literature, Information and Shakespeare

Critical Literacy: Perspectives, Bias and Questions of Beliefs, Values, Identity and Power

1.8About 70 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can tell the difference between a perspective and a bias.
  • I can analyse word choice, missing voices and stereotypes in a text.
  • I can comment on questions a text raises about beliefs, values, identity and power.
  • I can ask who is telling a story about a community, and why that matters.

Words to know

critical literacy
Reading to question whose views a text presents, whose it leaves out, and who benefits.
perspective
The point of view a text comes from.
bias
An unfair slant in a text, from loaded words, missing facts or voices, or stereotypes.
stereotype
An oversimplified idea about a whole group of people.
loaded words
Words with strong positive or negative connotations that push the reader's opinion.
antagonist
The character or force that opposes the main character.
omission
Something important left out of a text.
depiction
The way a person or group is shown in a text.

Hook: who is holding the camera?

Every photo leaves something out of the frame. Every story is told by someone, from somewhere, for some reason. Critical literacy means asking: Whose view is this? Whose view is missing? Who gains if I believe it? It doesn't mean being negative. It means reading with your eyes open.

Remember from Grade 9

In Grade 9 you looked at perspectives and bias and at diversity, inclusion and accessibility in texts, and you learned the principles of Indigenous Storywork. In Grade 10 you go further: you analyse perspectives and biases and comment on the questions they raise about beliefs, values, identity and power.

Perspective and bias

  • A perspective is the point of view a text comes from, shaped by the writer's experiences, culture, time period and position. Every text has one. That is not a flaw.
  • Bias is an unfair slant: favouring one side by leaving out important facts or voices, using loaded words, or relying on stereotypes (oversimplified ideas about a group).

Four big questions

The curriculum names four areas a critical reader comments on:

  1. Beliefs: What does the text assume is true or normal?
  2. Values: What does it treat as good, important or admirable?
  3. Identity: Which groups are shown, and how? Who is missing or shown only as a stereotype?
  4. Power: Who gets to speak? Who is spoken about? Who benefits from this way of telling it?
THE TEXTWhose story? Told how?BELIEFSWhat does it assumeis true or normal?VALUESWhat does it treatas good or important?IDENTITYWho is shown? How?Who is missing?POWERWho speaks? Whobenefits? Who decides?
Four questions for any text. They apply equally to news reports, novels, ads and Shakespeare.

Same event, two reports

Two imaginary local news reports cover the same event: the town food bank served more people this month than ever before.

Report 1Food Bank Sees RecordDemand as Costs Risequotes: a parent who usesthe food bank; the director;a volunteerwords: “families”, “neighbours”,“working two jobs”cause: rising rent andgrocery pricesReport 2Handout Lines SwampDowntown Againquotes: a nearby storeowner only; no one whouses the food bankwords: “handout”, “swamp”,“the same faces”cause: not mentioned(implies people's own fault)
The same event reported two ways. Compare who is quoted, the words chosen to describe people, and whether the cause is explained.
Worked example

Let's analyse how poverty and people who are poor are depicted

Determine the fairness of each report's depiction of people who use the food bank. Comment on the questions it raises about values and power.

  1. Who speaks (power): Report 1 quotes a parent who uses the food bank, as well as the director and a volunteer. Report 2 quotes only a store owner. In Report 2, people who use the food bank are spoken about but never get to speak.
  2. Word choice (identity): Report 1 uses families, neighbours, working two jobs, words that show people as members of the community. Report 2 uses handout, swamp and the same faces: loaded words that suggest a flood or a burden.
  3. What's left out (beliefs): Report 1 explains a cause (rising rent and grocery prices). Report 2 gives none, which lets readers assume people are at fault. That is a stereotype about poverty.
  4. Values: Report 1 values community support; Report 2 seems to value the comfort of businesses over the needs of people using the food bank.
  5. Judgement: Report 2 is biased: it excludes the people most affected and uses loaded words. Report 1 is fairer, though a critical reader might still ask whether it includes any solutions or government responses.

Report 1 is fairer (includes affected voices, explains causes). Report 2 shows bias (no affected voices, loaded words, no causes), which raises questions about who has the power to tell the story.

Villains, stereotypes and fairness

Critical literacy also applies to fiction. Ask how a novel's antagonist (villain) is depicted:

  • Is the villain marked by a disability, a scar or a foreign accent, as if these signal evil? Many older stories and films do this, and it can reinforce harmful stereotypes about real people.
  • Does the villain have motives, or are they evil just because the plot needs someone to be?
  • Which group does the hero belong to, and which group does the villain belong to? What message might that send?

These questions don't mean you can't enjoy a story. They help you notice what the story teaches about who matters.

Worked example

Let's question a villain

In an imaginary adventure novel, the villain is a hunched, scarred stranger who speaks with a thick foreign accent and lives alone in the woods. The hero is a popular, athletic local teen. Analyse the depiction.

  1. Identity: the villain's evil is signalled by physical difference (hunched, scarred), foreignness (thick foreign accent) and isolation, not by actions.
  2. Beliefs: the text assumes that looking or sounding different is a sign of danger. That is a stereotype.
  3. Power: the hero comes from the majority group; the villain is an outsider who never gets to explain their side.
  4. Question raised: what might readers who have a disability, a scar or an accent feel? Could the story be just as exciting if the villain's evil came from choices and motives instead?

The depiction is unfair: it links villainy to disability, appearance and foreignness. It raises questions about whose identities a story treats as normal and whose as threatening.

Who tells the story? First Nations, Métis and Inuit perspectives

For much of Canada's history, many books, films and textbooks about First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples were created by outsiders, and many relied on stereotypes. Indigenous writers have long pushed back. In 1892, the Mohawk poet E. Pauline Johnson (Tekahionwake), whom you met in Grade 8, published an essay, A Strong Race Opinion: On the Indian Girl in Modern Fiction, criticizing novelists who wrote Indigenous women characters as tragic stereotypes rather than real people.

Today, First Nations, Métis and Inuit authors, filmmakers and journalists tell stories about their own Nations and communities, in many forms and from many perspectives. A critical reader asks of any text about a community: Is a member of that community telling this story? Who was consulted? Whose knowledge is treated as expert?

Hands-on activity

Front-page frame-up

You need: two news websites, newspapers or broadcasts covering the same story (a grown-up can help you pick a suitable one), and a notebook.

  1. Read both versions of the same story.
  2. Make a chart with four rows: Who is quoted? Loaded words? What is left out? Who benefits? Fill it in for each version.
  3. Write a paragraph judging which version is fairer, and what questions it raises about beliefs, values, identity or power.
  4. Rewrite the headline of the less fair version so it is more balanced.

What to look for: specific words and quotations from each source, attention to missing voices, and a balanced headline that is still interesting.

Your turn

1

What is the difference between a perspective and a bias?

2

Name the four areas of questions critical readers comment on.

3

Find two loaded words in Report 2 and explain their effect.

4

Why does it matter who is quoted in a news story?

5

How does the villain description rely on stereotypes?

6

What did Pauline Johnson's 1892 essay criticize?

7

Write one balanced headline for the food bank event.

More practice: warm-up

1

Does every text have a perspective?

2

What is a stereotype?

3

In Report 1, what cause is given for the record demand?

4

What is an antagonist?

5

Which Nation was E. Pauline Johnson from?

More practice: on your own

1

Why might leaving out the cause of the food bank demand be a form of bias?

2

Is Report 1 completely unbiased? Explain.

3

Rewrite the villain description so that the character is menacing because of actions and motives rather than appearance.

4

Why is it important to ask whether a member of a community is telling a story about that community?

5

Choose one of the four big questions and apply it to an ad you know.

Challenge

1

Write a paragraph analysing Report 2's perspective and bias, and comment on one question it raises about power.

2

Some people say, It's just a story; analysing stereotypes in fiction ruins it. Respond with a balanced argument.

3

Explain how a single text can show a perspective without being biased. Use an example.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Bias in a text is...

2.

Which question is mainly about power?

3.

Report 2 is biased mainly because it...

4.

A villain marked as evil only by a scar and an accent is an example of...

5.

Pauline Johnson's 1892 essay criticized...

6.

Which word choice is most neutral for people using a food bank?

For parents and teachers

What this lesson teaches: ENG2D Reading 1.8 (critical literacy): identifying and analysing perspectives and biases and commenting on questions they raise about beliefs, values, identity and power. It uses the curriculum's examples of depictions of poverty in news reports and of villains in novels; Shakespeare's comic characters are examined in the Macbeth lessons.

How to help at home:

  • Compare two news reports of the same event and ask who was quoted.
  • When watching a film, ask how the villain is shown and why.
  • Keep the tone curious, not cynical: the goal is noticing, not rejecting everything.

Common difficulties:

  • Thinking perspective equals bias. Every text has a perspective.
  • **Name-calling a text biased without evidence.** Ask for the exact words or missing voices.
  • Sensitive topics. Poverty, disability and identity can be personal. Keep discussion respectful and about how texts depict people, not about judging real individuals.

This lesson has no joke block on purpose, because it deals with stereotypes and poverty.

Facts used: E. Pauline Johnson (Tekahionwake, 1861 to 1913), a Mohawk poet and performer from Six Nations of the Grand River, published A Strong Race Opinion: On the Indian Girl in Modern Fiction in 1892. The two reports and the villain were created for this website.