Grade by Grade
B. Canada, 1914–1929 · Canada, 1914–1929

Who Was Welcome? Immigration, Racism and Resilience, 1914–1929

B3.4 B2.6 B2.3 B1.1 B2.4 A1.4 A1.5About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can analyse immigration statistics from 1913 to 1929 and explain the trends.
  • I can describe Canada's immigration policy, including the 1919 Immigration Act changes and the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923.
  • I can describe attitudes toward, and discrimination against, ethnocultural groups, including racism, antisemitism and segregation, and the Ku Klux Klan and Orange Order.
  • I can explain how immigrant and Black communities built organizations and contributed to Canadian heritage.

Words to know

immigration policy
The laws and rules a country uses to decide who may come to live there.
exclusion
Keeping a group out completely; the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 excluded almost all Chinese immigrants.
head tax
A fee charged to each Chinese person entering Canada from 1885 to 1923.
racism
Treating people unfairly, or believing they are inferior, because of their race or ethnic origin.
antisemitism
Prejudice, hatred or discrimination against Jewish people.
segregation
Keeping people apart by race, for example in separate schools, theatres or neighbourhoods.
nativism
The belief that people born in a country, or of the "right" origins, deserve more rights than immigrants.
restrictive covenant
A clause in a property deed that banned selling or renting a home to people of certain groups.

A note on this lesson

This lesson describes racism and antisemitism in Canada's past. Hateful views are described, not repeated. If you or your family have faced discrimination, this lesson may bring up strong feelings; talk with your grown-up. There is no joke block in this lesson.

Reading the numbers first (B1.1)

Before deciding what the government did, look at what happened. The chart shows immigrant arrivals each year, from Statistics Canada's historical records.

Immigrant arrivals to Canada, 1913–19290100 000200 000300 000400 000191319151917191919211923192519271929War years (1914–1918)Source: Canada Year Book (Statistics Canada). Bar heights to scale.
Immigration collapsed during the war (shaded differently) and partly recovered in the 1920s, peaking at 166 783 in 1928, well below the 400 870 of 1913.

What shaped the trend?

  • War (1914–1918): dangerous seas, soldiers needed at home in Europe, and Canada's restrictions on people from enemy countries.
  • Postwar recession (1920–1922): fewer jobs meant fewer newcomers were wanted.
  • New laws (1919): Parliament amended the Immigration Act to let the government bar immigrants by nationality or because of their "customs" or "modes of life". People from former enemy countries were barred for several years, and Doukhobors, Mennonites and Hutterites, whose faiths forbade military service, were barred for a time.
  • Boom (mid-1920s): businesses, railways and farmers wanted workers. In 1925, the Railways Agreement let the CPR and CNR recruit farm workers from central and eastern Europe. Britain and Canada also helped British families come under the 1922 Empire Settlement plan. About 20 000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union, fleeing persecution and famine, settled in Canada in the 1920s.
  • 1929–1931: the Depression cut immigration sharply (next unit).
Who was welcome? Canada's unofficial ranking of immigrants in the 1920s"Preferred"British and American immigrants: welcomed, sometimes helped with faresNextNorthern and western Europeans (e.g. Scandinavians, Dutch, Germans after 1923)"Non-preferred"Central and eastern Europeans: admitted mainly as farm workers and domesticsSeverely restrictedChinese (banned 1923), Japanese, South Asian, Black, many Jewish people
Canada's policy ranked people by origin. The wider the bar, the more welcome officials considered the group. This ranking was based on racist ideas about who could "fit in".

The Chinese Immigration Act, 1923

Since 1885, Chinese immigrants had paid a head tax to enter Canada, rising to $500 in 1903 (you met this in Grade 8). In 1923, Parliament went further. The Chinese Immigration Act banned almost all Chinese immigration; only a few groups, such as diplomats, some merchants and students, were exempt. Every Chinese person already in Canada had to register with the government. The Act took effect on 1 July 1923, Dominion Day, which many Chinese Canadians called Humiliation Day and refused to celebrate.

Consequences: fewer than 50 Chinese immigrants were admitted between 1923 and 1947. Families were separated for decades: men in Canada could not bring wives and children. Chinese Canadian communities, in Vancouver, Victoria, Toronto and Montreal, became mostly communities of ageing men. Chinese Canadians organized through benevolent associations to support one another and protest. The Act was repealed in 1947, and in 2006 the Government of Canada formally apologized for the head tax and exclusion.

Chinese Canadians and federal law (spacing to scale)1885$50 head tax1903Head taxrises to $5001923ChineseImmigrationAct: exclusion1947Actrepealed2006Federalapology
More than 120 years from the first head tax to the apology. The exclusion law lasted 24 years.

Other ethnocultural groups (B2.6)

  • Japanese Canadians: an agreement with Japan in 1908 limited Japanese immigration to 400 people a year; in 1928 it was cut to 150. In B.C., Japanese Canadians could not vote and were barred from some jobs and professions.
  • South Asian Canadians: the continuous journey rule (1908) still blocked almost all immigration from India; from 1919, wives and children of men already in Canada were allowed to join them.
  • Jewish Canadians: many Jewish immigrants came from eastern Europe and built communities in Montreal, Toronto and Winnipeg, with synagogues, schools, newspapers and mutual-aid societies. They faced antisemitism: some universities, such as McGill, made admission harder for Jewish students in the 1920s; "restrictive covenants" in property deeds and "Gentiles only" signs at some resorts excluded them. In 1929, Adrien Arcand began publishing antisemitic newspapers in Montreal; in the 1930s he would lead a Canadian fascist movement (next unit). Groups such as the Jewish Immigrant Aid Society helped newcomers settle.
  • Eastern Europeans: Ukrainian, Polish and other newcomers, many of them recently labelled "enemy aliens", faced suspicion and were often stereotyped as radicals during the Red Scare. They built churches, community halls, reading clubs, newspapers and cooperatives.

Black Canadians: barriers and contributions (2026 focus)

Black communities had lived in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Ontario for generations, and newer communities had formed on the Prairies and in cities. In the 1920s, newcomers from the Caribbean came to cities such as Montreal and Toronto and to Sydney, Nova Scotia.

Barriers: Black Canadians faced segregation in schools (especially in Nova Scotia and parts of Ontario), theatres, restaurants, hotels and some hospitals, and job discrimination: many Black men could find railway work only as sleeping car porters. Immigration officials discouraged Black immigrants.

Organizing and contributions:

  • The Order of Sleeping Car Porters, founded in Winnipeg in 1917 by John A. Robinson and others, was the first Black railway union in North America; within two years it won contracts with two railways.
  • The Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) opened its first Canadian divisions in Montreal and Toronto in 1919; at its peak there were 32 divisions across Canada. Its Liberty Halls were centres of political, social and cultural life, and its Black Cross Nurses provided care in their communities.
  • Black churches, such as those of the African United Baptist Association in Nova Scotia, were centres of education, leadership and mutual support.
  • The No. 2 Construction Battalion's chaplain, Rev. William A. White of Nova Scotia, was one of very few Black commissioned officers in the British Empire's forces in the war.
  • Newspapers such as The Dawn of Tomorrow (London, Ontario, from 1923) gave Black Canadians a voice.

Organized hatred: the Ku Klux Klan and the Orange Order (B2.3)

  • The Ku Klux Klan, a white-supremacist hate group from the United States, set up branches across Canada in the 1920s. It was strongest in Saskatchewan, where by the late 1920s it claimed 40 000 members. It targeted Catholics (including French Canadians), Jewish people, Black people and eastern European immigrants. Its influence helped defeat Saskatchewan's Liberal government in 1929. The Klan is an example of an extreme ideology in Canada.
  • The Orange Order, a Protestant fraternal organization with roots in Ireland, was very influential in Ontario. Many members held strong anti-Catholic views and opposed French-language Catholic schools, supporting measures like Regulation 17. Unlike the Klan, it was a mainstream organization with many members in government; its influence shows how religious prejudice shaped Canadian politics.

Who stood against hate? Catholic and Jewish organizations, Black churches and the UNIA, labour unions, some newspapers, and many individual Canadians spoke out against the Klan and discrimination.

Worked example

Modelled example: Analysing a trend with evidence

Using the chart and the lesson, explain why immigration in 1928 (166 783) was so much lower than in 1913 (400 870), even though the late 1920s were a boom.

  1. Calculate: 166 783 ÷ 400 870 ≈ 0.42, so 1928 was about 42% of the 1913 level.
  2. Economic factors: the 1920s boom created jobs, but many were in cities and resource industries; the best Prairie homestead land had already been taken.
  3. Policy factors: the 1919 amendments allowed the government to exclude groups by nationality and customs; the 1923 Chinese Immigration Act banned Chinese immigration; Japanese immigration was cut further in 1928; officials ranked Europeans and discouraged Black and Jewish immigrants.
  4. International factors: the United States was also restricting immigration, and Europe was recovering from war; the Soviet Union restricted emigration.
  5. Conclude: policy choices deliberately limited who could come, so immigration stayed far below the pre-war peak despite prosperity.

Immigration was lower mainly because of restrictive, discriminatory policy combined with changing economic needs. Numbers alone do not explain a trend: you need context.

Hands-on activity

Family and community heritage map

You need: paper (or a printed map of the world), coloured pencils, and a conversation with family members.

  1. Ask family members where your family's roots are and, if they came to Canada, roughly when and why. (If your family is Indigenous, mark your Nation's homeland; Indigenous peoples did not immigrate.) If you don't know, that's fine: map your neighbourhood's communities instead, using local places of worship, community centres, restaurants and shops as evidence.
  2. Mark the places on the map and draw arrows.
  3. Choose one group on your map and research what Canada's immigration policy toward that group was in the 1920s. Would your family have been "preferred", "non-preferred" or excluded?
  4. Write a paragraph: How did that policy affect people like my family or my neighbours, and what contributions have they made?

Look for: accurate use of 1920s policy and a respectful description of contributions.

Your turn

1

What was the peak year for immigration in this period, and how many arrived?

2

What did the 1919 amendments to the Immigration Act allow the government to do?

3

What did the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 do?

4

Why did many Chinese Canadians call 1 July 1923 "Humiliation Day"?

5

What was the Order of Sleeping Car Porters?

6

What was the Ku Klux Klan, and where in Canada was it strongest?

7

Give two examples of antisemitism in Canada in the 1920s.

More practice: warm-up

1

How many immigrants arrived in 1915?

2

When was the Chinese Immigration Act repealed?

3

When did the federal government apologize for the head tax and Chinese exclusion?

4

In which two cities did the UNIA open its first Canadian divisions in 1919?

5

What is segregation?

More practice: on your own

1

Describe the trend in immigration from 1913 to 1929 in two sentences, using numbers.

2

How did the 1923 Act affect Chinese Canadian families?

3

Why did the government sign the 1925 Railways Agreement?

4

How did the UNIA help Black Canadians in the 1920s?

5

Compare the Ku Klux Klan and the Orange Order.

Challenge

1

"Canada's immigration policy in the 1920s was designed to build a British and white Canada." Evaluate this claim with evidence.

2

Explain how discrimination in this period connects to the 2026 course focus on extreme ideologies and antisemitism.

3

Choose one group and write an inquiry question about its contributions to Canadian heritage in 1914–1929, with two sources.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

In which year did the most immigrants arrive in Canada between 1913 and 1929?

2.

What did the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 do?

3.

Which group did Canadian officials consider "preferred" immigrants in the 1920s?

4.

The Order of Sleeping Car Porters (1917) was:

5.

Where was the Ku Klux Klan strongest in Canada in the late 1920s?

6.

Which is an example of antisemitism in Canada in the 1920s?

7.

Why did immigration recover in the mid-1920s but stay below 1913 levels?

For parents and teachers

Big idea: This lesson covers immigration policy and newcomers' contributions in B3.4, discrimination against non-Indigenous ethnocultural groups in B2.6 (racism, antisemitism, segregation, the Chinese Immigration Act), the Ku Klux Klan and Orange Order from B2.3, groups helping newcomers from B2.4, and immigration trends from B1.1. It gives weight to the contributions of Black individuals and communities and to early antisemitism and extreme ideologies, both emphasized in the 2026 revision.

How to help: The heritage map activity can open powerful family conversations. Be ready for your teen to learn that some families, perhaps your own, were unwelcome under 1920s policies. If your family is Indigenous, help your teen mark your Nation's homeland rather than an immigration route.

Sensitivity: Hate groups and antisemitism are described without repeating slurs or hateful material.

Common difficulties: Explaining trends only with economics and forgetting policy; describing groups only as victims rather than also as builders of communities.