Grade by Grade
E. Liveable Communities · Liveable Communities: Land Use and Sustainability in Canada

Spreading Out or Building Up? Urban Sprawl and Compact Growth

E1.4 A1.4 A1.5About 75 minutes
Learning goals
  • I can describe urban sprawl, compact growth and other patterns of urban growth such as leapfrog and ribbon development.
  • I can assess the impacts of urban sprawl on the natural environment (farmland, wetlands, habitat, water, air) and on the built environment (roads, pipes, costs, traffic).
  • I can assess the benefits and challenges of compact growth.
  • I can calculate how density affects the amount of land and infrastructure a community needs.

Words to know

urban sprawl
Low-density, spread-out development at the edge of a city, usually with separated land uses and heavy dependence on cars.
compact growth
Growth that uses land efficiently, with higher density and a mix of uses close together.
intensification
Adding more homes and jobs to areas that are already built up, for example through infill, redevelopment or adding units to existing houses.
infill
New buildings on vacant or under-used lots within an existing built-up area.
leapfrog development
New development that jumps past undeveloped land, leaving gaps between it and the existing city.
ribbon (strip) development
Development stretched out in a line along a highway or main road.
habitat fragmentation
When roads and development break natural areas into smaller, separated patches, making it harder for wildlife to survive and move.
infrastructure
The basic systems a community needs: roads, water and sewer pipes, power lines, transit, schools, hospitals.

Remember from Grade 8

In Grade 8 you met urban sprawl and intensification as trends in settlement. In Grade 9 you will assess them: measure their impacts, weigh pros and cons, and compare different kinds of urban growth.

Hook: where did the farm go?

Ask an adult who grew up in a fast-growing part of southern Ontario (like the edges of the Greater Toronto Area, Ottawa or the Waterloo Region) what used to be where today's newest subdivisions are. Often the answer is: fields, orchards and woodlots. Once farmland is paved, it is very hard to get back.

Kinds of urban growth

  • Urban sprawl: low density, separated uses (homes in one place, shopping in another, jobs in a third), wide roads, large parking lots, and most trips by car.
  • Leapfrog development: subdivisions built some distance beyond the city edge, skipping over land. It needs long new roads and pipes to reach it.
  • Ribbon (strip) development: stores, gas stations and businesses lined up along a highway leaving town.
  • Compact growth: higher density, mixed uses, connected streets, transit, and neighbourhoods where many daily needs are within walking distance.
  • Intensification: growing inside the existing city: infill on empty lots, redeveloping old plazas and parking lots, mid-rise buildings on main streets, and "gentle density" such as basement apartments, laneway and garden suites. Since 2022, Ontario's rules have allowed up to three residential units on most serviced residential lots.
Same distance as the crow flies, very different walks (model)Grid streetshomestoreCurving streets and cul-de-sacsmain roadbackyard fences: no shortcuthomestore
In both neighbourhoods the store is about the same straight-line distance from home. On a grid, a walker can take a fairly direct route. In a cul-de-sac layout, fences and dead ends force a long detour to the main road, so more people drive.

Impacts of sprawl on the natural environment

  • Loss of farmland: much of Canada's best farmland is in southern Ontario, close to growing cities. Every new low-density subdivision on a farm field removes food-producing land.
  • Loss and fragmentation of habitat: wetlands, woodlots and meadows are cleared or cut into small patches by roads, which harms wildlife such as turtles, frogs and migrating animals.
  • Water: more paved surfaces mean more runoff, more flooding, warmer and dirtier streams, and less water soaking in to recharge groundwater.
  • Air and climate: car-dependent communities produce more greenhouse gases and air pollution from driving.

Impacts of sprawl on the built environment and people

  • Infrastructure costs: spread-out homes need more kilometres of road, pipe and wire per household, which costs more to build, plow, repair and eventually replace.
  • Traffic and commuting: long drives and congestion use time and money.
  • Services: buses, schools and stores are harder to support at low density.
  • Health and independence: less walking in daily life, and people who cannot drive depend on others.
  • Benefits people value: larger homes and yards, quiet streets, and often lower prices per square metre than central areas, which is why many families choose suburbs.
Land needed for 12 000 new homes at different densities15 homes/ha (low-density suburb)800 ha30 homes/ha (mix of houses and townhouses)400 ha60 homes/ha (townhouses and mid-rise)200 haEvery hectare not used can stay as farmland, forest or wetland.
Housing 12 000 households at 15 homes per hectare uses 800 ha, four times the land needed at 60 homes per hectare (200 ha). Bars are drawn to scale.
Worked example

Let's calculate land and road needs

A region expects 30 000 more people in 20 years. The average household size is 2.5 people. (a) How many homes are needed? (b) How much land is needed at 15 homes/ha and at 60 homes/ha? (c) If each new hectare of development needs about 0.1 km of new road, how much new road does each option need?

  1. (a) Homes = people ÷ people per household = 30 000 ÷ 2.5 = 12 000 homes.
  2. (b) Land = homes ÷ density. At 15 homes/ha: 12 000 ÷ 15 = 800 ha. At 60 homes/ha: 12 000 ÷ 60 = 200 ha.
  3. Difference: 800 − 200 = 600 ha, which is 6 km² of farmland or nature saved.
  4. (c) Road: 800 ha × 0.1 km/ha = 80 km; 200 ha × 0.1 km/ha = 20 km.
  5. Road per home: 80 km ÷ 12 000 ≈ 6.7 m per home versus 20 km ÷ 12 000 ≈ 1.7 m per home. Every metre must be built, plowed and repaired forever.

12 000 homes; 800 ha and 80 km of road at low density versus 200 ha and 20 km of road at higher density. Compact growth saves 600 ha of land and 60 km of road (using this simple example's assumptions).

Assessing compact growth

Compact growth has strong benefits: it protects farmland and nature, makes transit and walkable shops possible, and uses existing pipes and roads efficiently. But it brings challenges too:

  • older pipes, schools and parks in existing neighbourhoods may need upgrades to serve more people
  • taller buildings can cast shadows, add traffic on local streets and change a neighbourhood's character
  • land near transit can become very expensive, and redevelopment can push out existing tenants and small businesses
  • smaller units may not suit large families unless family-sized units are planned

Geographers assess growth by asking: Who benefits? Who pays? What are the short-term and long-term effects on people and the environment?

Reading air photos and satellite images (A1.4)

Comparing satellite or air photos of the same place from different years is a powerful way to see sprawl. Many online mapping tools have a historical imagery feature. Look for: farm fields turning into subdivisions, new highway interchanges, new big-box stores, and woodlots that shrink or disappear.

Just for fun

Why did the cul-de-sac never get lost?

No matter how far it went, it always ended up right back where it started.

Hands-on activity

Then-and-now image comparison

You need: an online map with historical imagery (or old and new air photos from your municipality or library), paper and a pencil.

  1. Pick an area at the edge of a town or city near you.
  2. Look at the oldest image you can find, then the newest. Sketch both side by side on paper (simple shapes are fine).
  3. Label what changed: new roads, homes, stores, lost fields or woodlots.
  4. Estimate how much of the area changed from farmland or nature to built-up land, using a grid of 10 × 10 squares drawn over your sketch (count squares).
  5. Write a paragraph: what type of growth is this (sprawl, leapfrog, ribbon, compact)? Give one natural-environment impact and one built-environment impact.

What to look for: labelled sketches, a reasonable percentage estimate, and a correct name for the growth type with two specific impacts.

Your turn

1

Define urban sprawl in your own words and give two of its features.

2

Why does sprawl cost more for roads and pipes per household?

3

A town needs 4 500 homes. How much land is needed at 15 homes/ha? At 45 homes/ha?

4

Name two effects of sprawl on wildlife.

5

Give one reason many families still choose suburban homes.

6

What is leapfrog development, and why is it costly?

7

Give one challenge of compact growth.

More practice: warm-up

1

What is infill?

2

What kind of development lines a highway leaving town?

3

How many m² are in a hectare?

4

Which uses more land for the same number of homes: 15 homes/ha or 60 homes/ha?

5

Name one type of "gentle density".

More practice: on your own

1

Explain how sprawl can increase flooding downstream.

2

12 000 homes at 20 homes/ha versus 50 homes/ha: how much land is saved by the higher density?

3

Why is it harder to run frequent buses in a sprawling subdivision?

4

Using the street-layout diagram, explain how street design affects how people travel.

5

Is intensification always good? Give one benefit and one concern.

Challenge

1

A region has 2 000 ha of farmland at its edge. If it grows by 12 000 homes at 15 homes/ha, what percentage of that farmland is used? What if it grows at 40 homes/ha?

2

Assess this statement: "Sprawl is cheaper for everyone because suburban houses cost less."

3

Suggest a growth pattern that keeps some benefits of suburbs while reducing sprawl's impacts, and explain.

Check your understanding

Quiz

1.

Which is a feature of urban sprawl?

2.

12 000 homes at 30 homes per hectare need:

3.

Habitat fragmentation means:

4.

Why does low-density development usually cost more per household for infrastructure?

5.

Building a new apartment on an empty lot inside an existing neighbourhood is called:

6.

Which is a CHALLENGE of compact growth?

For parents and teachers

This lesson asks students to weigh both sides, not to decide that suburbs are "bad". If your family lives in a suburb, that is a great chance to talk about why you chose it and what trade-offs you notice (driving, space, cost). The calculations use simple division (homes ÷ density); if answers look strange, check that the student divided by density rather than multiplying. The then-and-now image activity works with any online map that offers historical imagery; ask your teen to show you what changed.