B. Civic Awareness · Civic Awareness: Democratic Values, Governance and RightsDemocratic Values, Their Roots and Why People Take Action
B1.2 B1.4 A2.2About 70 minutes
Learning goals- I can explain democracy, human rights, freedom and the rule of law.
- I can describe key historical foundations of these values.
- I can explain how these values show up in what citizens do.
- I can explain why people have taken civic action in the past and still do today, with examples.
- I can discuss a sensitive civic topic respectfully.
Words to know
democracy
A system in which the people hold power, usually by electing representatives (representative democracy) or sometimes by voting directly on decisions (direct democracy).
human rights
Rights every person has simply because they are human, such as dignity, equality and life.
freedom
The ability to think, speak, believe, meet and act without unjust interference, within reasonable limits.
rule of law
The principle that everyone, including government leaders, must follow the law, and that laws are known and applied fairly by independent courts.
responsible government
A system in which the cabinet must keep the support (confidence) of the elected assembly to stay in power.
suffrage
The right to vote.
civic action
Something a person or group does to influence or improve their community, such as voting, petitioning, volunteering or peaceful protest.
Is it fair?
Imagine your class holds an election for student council. The principal announces the winner without counting the ballots. Then the winner makes a rule that only their friends can use the gym. You would be upset, and you would be right.
Your reaction shows you already hold some democratic values: the people should choose, everyone should be treated equally, and even leaders must follow the rules. Canada's system of government is built on these same ideas. This lesson names them, shows where they came from, and looks at how people act on them.
Four fundamental beliefs and values
1. Democracy. Demos is Greek for "the people" and kratos means "power". In a direct democracy, citizens vote on decisions themselves. Canada is a representative democracy: we elect people (MPs, MPPs, councillors) to make decisions for us, and we can replace them at the next election.
2. Human rights. Every person has equal dignity and worth. Human rights include equality, the right to life and security, and protection from discrimination. They belong to everyone, not only citizens.
3. Freedom. Canadians have freedoms of conscience and religion, of thought and expression (including the press), of peaceful assembly and of association. Freedoms are not unlimited. For example, freedom of expression does not protect threats.
4. The rule of law. Laws must be public, apply equally to everyone (including the Prime Minister and the police), and be applied by independent courts. No one is above the law.
Other values that support these four include equality, respect for diversity, the common good and peaceful ways of settling disagreement. Canada's Constitution also gives Parliament power to make laws for the "peace, order, and good government" of Canada.
Four fundamental values hold up democratic citizenship. The foundation is people who take part. Without them, the pillars stand on nothing.Where did these ideas come from?
These values grew over centuries, from many places:
- Athens (about 2 500 years ago): citizens voted directly on laws in an assembly. But only adult male citizens counted. Women, enslaved people and foreigners were shut out. Democracy started small.
- The Haudenosaunee Confederacy: long before Europeans arrived, the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga and Seneca nations (later joined by the Tuscarora) united under the Great Law of Peace, with councils that decide by consensus and clan mothers who choose and can remove chiefs. This is a living system of governance, still practised today.
- Magna Carta (1215): English barons forced King John to accept that the king, too, was bound by law. Its promise that no free man could be imprisoned except by the lawful judgment of his peers or the law of the land is a root of the rule of law and fair trials.
- English Bill of Rights (1689): limited the monarch's power and strengthened Parliament.
- Responsible government (1848): Nova Scotia and then the Province of Canada won the rule that the cabinet must keep the support of the elected assembly. Power moved from appointed governors toward elected representatives.
- Confederation (1867): created Canada as a federation with an elected House of Commons.
- Expanding the vote: at Confederation, voting was limited mostly to men who owned property. Most women won the federal vote in 1918 (Manitoba was the first province to give women the vote, in 1916). Chinese and South Asian Canadians won the federal vote in 1947, Japanese Canadians in 1948, Inuit in 1950, and Status First Nations people in 1960 without having to give up their status.
- The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982): wrote rights and freedoms into the Constitution. You will study it in Lesson 10.
Some historical foundations of democratic values in Canada. Notice how long it took for the vote to include everyone.Values become actions
Values are not just ideas. You can see them in what citizens do. Civic action can be quiet (reading the news, voting) or loud (a march), local (a park clean-up) or global (a campaign about human rights).
| Value | What it looks like in action |
|---|
| Democracy | Voting; running for student council; writing to your MPP |
| Human rights | Speaking up when someone is excluded; supporting accessibility |
| Freedom | Peaceful protest; a free press; joining a club or union |
| Rule of law | Serving on a jury; reporting a crime; respecting court decisions |
Democratic values show up in everyday civic actions.Why do people take civic action?
People have many reasons:
- To fight an injustice they or others face.
- To protect something they value, such as water, a language or a neighbourhood.
- To hold power accountable when they think a government is wrong.
- Because of personal experience, culture, faith or a sense of duty to others.
- Because democracy needs it. If citizens stop taking part, decisions are made by fewer and fewer people.
Historical examples. Suffragists such as Nellie McClung campaigned for years for women's right to vote. In 1946, Viola Desmond, a Black businesswoman, refused to leave the whites-only section of a movie theatre in New Glasgow, Nova Scotia; she was arrested and fined, and she fought the charge in court. In 1929, five Alberta women known as the Famous Five won the Persons Case, which decided that women were "persons" who could be appointed to the Senate.
Current examples. Idle No More began in 2012 when four women in Saskatchewan organized teach-ins about Indigenous rights, land and water; it grew into a national movement. Autumn Peltier, from Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory on Manitoulin Island, has spoken around the world, including at the United Nations, for clean drinking water for First Nations. Young people across Canada have joined climate strikes and run for student trustee positions on school boards.
Worked exampleModelled example: Linking a value to an action
Explain how Viola Desmond's actions reflect democratic values, and what changed as a result.
- The action: in 1946 she sat in the main floor section of the theatre, was removed, arrested and fined, and then challenged her conviction in court.
- The value: equality and human rights: she believed Black Nova Scotians should be treated the same as everyone else.
- The method: she used legal, peaceful means, which also reflects the rule of law: she trusted the courts to judge fairly.
- Result (objectives and results): her court challenge failed at the time, but her case drew wide attention to racial segregation. Nova Scotia granted her a free pardon in 2010, and her portrait has been on the $10 bank note since 2018.
- Significance: her story shows that civic action can matter even when it does not win right away.
Viola Desmond acted on equality and human rights, using peaceful and legal methods. The short-term result was a loss in court; the long-term result was greater public awareness and official recognition that she had been wronged.
Discussing sensitive topics respectfully
Civic topics can touch people's identity, faith or family history. Good habits:
- Attack ideas, not people. Say "I disagree with that argument because..." not "That's stupid."
- Listen to understand, and summarize the other view before you reply.
- Use accurate, respectful terms (for example, First Nations, Métis and Inuit; people who use wheelchairs).
- Remember that some people in the room may live the issue. Speak as if they are listening, because they may be.
- Back claims with evidence, and say "I'm not sure" when you are not.
Just for funIn ancient Athens, citizens could vote to send a powerful politician away from the city for ten years. They scratched the person's name on a piece of broken pottery called an ostrakon. That is where the word ostracize comes from. Imagine voting someone off the island... with a broken pot.
Hands-on activityValues ranking at the kitchen table
You need: 8 small pieces of paper and a pen, and one or two family members.
- Write one value on each paper: democracy, equality, freedom of expression, rule of law, safety, respect for diversity, the environment, the common good.
- On your own, rank them from most to least important to you. Record your order.
- Ask a family member to rank them too, without seeing yours.
- Compare. Find the value where your rankings differ most and talk about why. Use the respectful-discussion tips.
- Discuss this scenario: a group wants to hold a loud protest in a park next to a hospital. Which values are in tension? (For example, freedom of assembly versus patients' rest and safety.) What rules might balance them?
- Write three sentences: your top value, an action you could take that reflects it, and one thing you learned from the other person's ranking.
What to look for: rankings with reasons, a scenario answer that names two values in tension, and a calm, respectful conversation.
Your turn
1What is the difference between direct democracy and representative democracy? Which does Canada mainly use?
In direct democracy citizens vote on decisions themselves; in representative democracy they elect people to decide for them. Canada mainly uses representative democracy (though referendums are sometimes held).
2Explain the rule of law in your own words, with an example.
Everyone, including leaders and police, must follow the same public laws, applied by independent courts. Example: a premier who breaks a traffic law gets the same ticket as anyone else.
3Why is Magna Carta (1215) seen as a foundation of the rule of law?
It established that the king was bound by law and that free men could not be imprisoned except by lawful judgment or the law of the land.
4What did responsible government (1848) change?
The cabinet had to keep the support of the elected assembly to govern, shifting power from appointed governors to elected representatives.
5Name one group that won the federal vote after 1918 and the year.
Any of: Chinese and South Asian Canadians (1947), Japanese Canadians (1948), Inuit (1950), Status First Nations people without losing status (1960).
6Give two reasons people take civic action.
Any two: to fight injustice, protect something they value, hold power accountable, because of personal experience or culture or faith, or because democracy needs participation.
7Match each action to a value: (a) serving on a jury; (b) writing a letter to the editor; (c) speaking up when a classmate is excluded for their religion.
(a) rule of law; (b) freedom of expression (and democracy); (c) human rights and equality.
More practice: warm-up
1What does the Greek word demos mean?
2Who could vote in ancient Athens?
Only adult male citizens.
3Which province first gave women the vote, and when?
5Name the six nations of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy.
Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca and Tuscarora.
More practice: on your own
1Freedom of expression is a core value, yet the law does not protect threats. Why do freedoms have limits?
Because one person's freedom can harm others' rights and safety. Limits such as banning threats protect other values (security, human rights). In Canada, limits must be reasonable and justified.
2Use stability and change to describe the history of the right to vote in Canada.
Change: the vote expanded from mostly property-owning men to women (1918), to racialized groups (1947, 1948), Inuit (1950) and Status First Nations people (1960). Stability: the idea of electing representatives to Parliament stayed the same throughout.
3Why is the Haudenosaunee Great Law of Peace an important example in a lesson on the roots of democratic values in Canada?
It shows that democratic ideas such as councils, consensus, and leaders who can be removed by others existed on this land long before European governments arrived, and it is still practised today.
4The Persons Case (1929) was decided in the women's favour. Using objectives and results, explain what the Famous Five wanted and what they achieved.
Objective: to have women recognized as "persons" under the law so they could be appointed to the Senate. Result: the decision said women were persons, opening Senate appointments to women and strengthening the push for equality.
5Autumn Peltier advocates for clean water. Which reasons for civic action from the lesson fit her work?
Protecting something she values (water, which many Anishinaabe teachings treat as sacred), fighting an injustice (some First Nations have lived for years under drinking water advisories), and her culture and community.
Challenge
1Athens is often called the birthplace of democracy, yet it excluded most people. Is it fair to call it democratic? Make a judgment with evidence.
Sample: It was democratic for its time because citizens voted directly on laws, a radical idea then. But by today's standards it was very limited, since women, enslaved people and foreigners were excluded. A balanced judgment: it was an important early step, not a model to copy. Look for evidence on both sides and clear criteria.
2Viola Desmond lost in court, but she is honoured today. What does her case show about how to judge whether civic action "worked"?
It shows that results can be long-term and indirect. Judging only by the immediate outcome (losing the case) misses the awareness it raised and the later pardon and recognition. Good evaluation looks at short- and long-term results and at public attitudes, not just legal wins.
3Choose two of the four fundamental values and describe a real or realistic situation in which they conflict. How might a democracy balance them?
Sample: freedom of assembly versus the rule of law and safety when a protest blocks a highway. A democracy might allow the protest in a nearby location or for a limited time, so people can be heard while emergency vehicles can still get through. Courts can decide whether limits are reasonable.
Check your understandingQuiz
1. Which statement best describes the rule of law?
3. What did Magna Carta (1215) establish?
4. In what year did Status First Nations people win the federal vote without losing their status?
5. Viola Desmond's 1946 action mainly reflected which value?
6. Which is a respectful way to disagree in a discussion?
For parents and teachersBig idea: Democracy, human rights, freedom and the rule of law are the core values of democratic citizenship in Canada (expectation B1.2). They developed slowly, and for much of Canada's history many people were excluded. People take civic action for many reasons (B1.4).
How to help: Do the values ranking together. Share stories from your own family or community about voting, protest, or being excluded or included. If your family came from another country, compare its system with Canada's.
Common difficulties:
- Thinking freedoms are unlimited. Discuss everyday limits (threats, false fire alarms).
- Treating history as a straight line of progress. Point out who was left out and for how long.
- Seeing civic action only as protest. Voting, volunteering and jury duty count too.
Some topics (racial segregation, the Indian Act) may be personal for some families; the respectful-discussion tips are worth practising at home too.